Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):375.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002340.

Radiation Exposure Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons: Deconstructing Commonly Held Myths and Misperceptions

Michael L Raffetto  1 , Laura E Blum  2 , Eric J Abbenhaus  1 , Gavin S Hautala  1 , Bryan Lemieux  3 , Tyler Pease  1 , Raymond D Wright  1 , Eric S Moghadamian  1 , Arun Aneja  1 , James A Blair  4 , Paul E Matuszewski  1
Affiliations
Comment

Radiation Exposure Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons: Deconstructing Commonly Held Myths and Misperceptions

Michael L Raffetto et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objectives: To review and evaluate the validity of common perceptions and practices regarding radiation safety in orthopaedic trauma.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

Subjects: N/A.

Intervention: The intervention involved personal protective equipment.

Main outcome measurements: The main outcome measurements included radiation dose estimates.

Results: Surgeon radiation exposure estimates performed at the level of the thyroid, chest, and pelvis demonstrate an estimated total annual exposure of 1521 mR, 2452 mR, and 1129 mR, respectively. In all cases, wearing lead provides a significant reduction (90% or better) in the amount of radiation exposure (in both radiation risk and levels of radiation reaching the body) received by the surgeon. Surgeons are inadequately protected from radiation exposure with noncircumferential lead. The commonly accepted notion that there is negligible exposure when standing greater than 6 feet from the radiation source is misleading, particularly when cumulative exposure is considered. Finally, we demonstrated that trauma surgeons specializing in pelvis and acetabular fracture care are at an increased risk of exposure to potentially dangerous levels of radiation, given the amount of radiation required for their caseload.

Conclusion: Common myths and misperceptions regarding radiation in orthopaedic trauma are unfounded. Proper use of circumferential personal protective equipment is critical in preventing excess radiation exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest. Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, and patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Comment on

References

    1. Giordano BD, Grauer JN, Miller CP, et al. Radiation exposure issues in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:e69.
    1. Rashid MS, Aziz S, Haydar S, et al. Intra-operative fluoroscopic radiation exposure in orthopaedic trauma theatre. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28:9–14.
    1. Chou LB, Chandran S, Harris AH, et al. Increased breast cancer prevalence among female orthopedic surgeons. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21:683–689.
    1. Chou LB, Lerner LB, Harris AH, et al. Cancer prevalence among a cross-sectional survey of female orthopedic, urology, and plastic surgeons in the United States. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25:476–481.
    1. Frane N, Megas A, Stapleton E, et al. Radiation exposure in orthopaedics. JBJS Rev. 2020;8:e0060.