Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 24:12:1513-1519.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S331296. eCollection 2021.

Team-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Comparison of Sudanese Medical Students' Performance

Affiliations

Team-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Comparison of Sudanese Medical Students' Performance

Karim Eldin M A Salih et al. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Aim: Students' performance in TBL compared to LBL needs to be evaluated. This study aimed to compare students' performance in team-based learning and traditional lectures.

Methods: A total of 176 class 4 and 202 class 6 medical students from University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan, participated in the study during 2018. Experienced staff were selected to conduct the teaching and assessment of the two groups, using the standard team-based learning procedure (iRAT, gRAT and AppT) in the first topic and the lecture-based learning procedure in the second, within the same time limit for the two methods.

Results: The two classes overall mean score has a significant 5.1 points difference (p<0.001; 95% CI: 3.5, 6.0). Separate analysis showed consistency of superiority of TBL to LBL in either gender. A remarkable difference was observed when we compared the two methods in class 6 separately from class 4. Class 6 mean score was high for both TBL and LBL (77.2 and 70.2, respectively), with a significant mean difference of 7.0 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 5.1, 8.9). In class 4, the score was lower for both methods (mean of 62.8 for TBL and 59.9 for LBL). The mean difference of 2.95 points was still significant (p<0.05; 95% CI: 0.46, 5.43). Separate multivariate linear regression for TBL and LBL showed no significant difference in performance of males and females in either method. Controlling for gender in TBL, class 4 had a mean of -14.26 points, (p<0.001; 95% CI: -12.54, -15.98) less than class 6. Similarly, in LBL, class 4 had a mean of -10.18 points (p<0.001, 95% CI: -7.02, -13.35), less than class 6.

Conclusion: Students' performance using team-based learning was superior to lecture-based learning, irrespective of students' gender, noticeable among senior students.

Keywords: assessment; curriculum; lecture-based curriculum; medical education; team-based learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of students’ scores in the tests following TBL and LBL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garland D. Assessment issues in group work. In: Foot HC, Howe CJ, Anderson A, Tolmie A, Warden D, editors. Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1994:417–422.
    1. Tribe D. An overview from higher education. In: Thorley L, Gregory R, editors. Using Group-Based Learning in Higher Education. London: Cogan Page; 1994:25–36.
    1. Acrreditation Councel for Pharmacy Education (ACPE). Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Chicago; 2011.
    1. Jensen E. Brain-Based Learning: The New Paradigm of Teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2008.
    1. Persky AM, Pollack GM. A modified team-based learning physiology course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(10):204. doi:10.5688/ajpe7510204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources