Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;13(11):6294-6303.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1071.

Prognostic factors and patients' profile in treated stage I and II lung adenocarcinoma: a Hospital's Cancer Registry-based analysis

Affiliations

Prognostic factors and patients' profile in treated stage I and II lung adenocarcinoma: a Hospital's Cancer Registry-based analysis

Fernando Conrado Abrão et al. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: It is known that survival from lung cancer can differ between countries and even between different regions of the same country. The variability between hospitals, the age and social profile, and the time when this patient was treated, can influence survival, and these factors are intrinsic to each region. Knowing the profile of patients, hospitals, and other factors associated with the treatment of stage I and II lung cancer in a given region is important to understand outcomes and propose improvements that can be replicated in any region of the world that presents the same profile of patients and care structure. This study evaluates survival and possible predictors in all patients with stage I and II lung cancer adenocarcinoma through the Hospital's Cancer Registry (HCR), responsible for the State of Sao Paulo's cancer registry, a geographical area with 40 million inhabitants.

Methods: Based on the HCR, an observational study was conducted, including 1,278 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma at clinical stages (CS) I and II. Sex, age at diagnosis, education, neighbourhood, CS at diagnosis, the time between diagnosis and treatment, 5-year periods in which patients were treated, treatment modality and hospitals where patients were treated were analysed. Cox univariate and multiple regression analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR).

Results: A total of 1,278 lung cancer patients with clinical lung cancer adenocarcinoma stages I and II were included. About 40.06% of patients did not receive surgery, and only 55.8% started the treatment within 2 months. The majority of the patients were treated in high complexity hospitals, 69%. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 45.6% in CS I and 27.5% in CS II. Patients treated in high complexity centres have lower mortality rates than those treated in Partial Hospital Complexity Centers in Oncology (PHCCO) (adjHR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.40; P=0.047). Patients diagnosed between 2010-2014 had a protective factor against the risk of death concerning patients diagnosed between 2000-2004.

Conclusions: The 5-year OS has significantly improved as long as the 5-year group analysed. Also, the 5-year OS of the patients treated in high complexity hospitals is higher than those treated in PHCCO.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma of the lung; cancer registry; cancer treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1071). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative 5-year overall survival rate. (A) Age group; (B) level of specialised institutions; (C) treatment proposed. HCCO, High Complexity Centers in Oncology; PHCCO, Partial Hospital Complexity Centers in Oncology.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration ; Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1749-68. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng TY, Cramb SM, Baade PD, et al. The International Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: Latest Trends, Disparities, and Tumor Characteristics. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1653-71. 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin HT, Liu FC, Wu CY, et al. Epidemiology and Survival Outcomes of Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:8148156. 10.1155/2019/8148156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck N, Hoeijmakers F, van der Willik EM, et al. National Comparison of Hospital Performances in Lung Cancer Surgery: The Role of Case Mix Adjustment. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:412-20. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romaszko AM, Doboszyńska A. Multiple primary lung cancer: A literature review. Adv Clin Exp Med 2018;27:725-30. 10.17219/acem/68631 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources