Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;13(11):6594-6601.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-2021-07.

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation

Daisuke Nakajima et al. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) has become an important life-saving option for patients with severe respiratory disorders, since it was developed by a group in the University of Southern California in 1993 and introduced in Japan in 1998 in order to address the current severe shortage of brain-dead donor organs. Although LDLLT candidates were basically limited to critically ill patients who would require hospitalization, the long-term use of steroids, and/or mechanical respiratory support prior to transplantation, LDLLT provided good post-transplant outcomes, comparable to brain-dead donor lung transplantation in the early and late phases. In Kyoto University, the 5- and 10-year survival rates after LDLLT were reported to be 79.0% and 64.6%, respectively. LDLLT should be performed under appropriate circumstances, considering the inherent risk to the living donor. In our transplant program, all living donors returned to their previous social lives without any major complications, and living-donor surgery was associated with a morbidity rate of <15%. Both functional and anatomical size matching were preoperatively performed between the living-donor lobar grafts and recipients. Precise size matching before surgery could provide a favorable pulmonary function and exercise capacity after LDLLT. Various transplant procedures have recently been developed in LDLLT in order to deal with the issue of graft size mismatching in recipients, and favorable post-transplant outcomes have been observed. Native upper lobe-sparing and/or right-to-left inverted transplantation have been performed for undersized grafts, while single-lobe transplantation has been employed with or without contralateral pneumonectomy and/or delayed chest closure for oversized grafts.

Keywords: Living donor; brain-dead donor; cadaveric lung transplantation; lobar lung transplantation; size matching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2021-07). The series “Lung Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Both authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The numbers of lung transplantation performed in Japan and newly registered patients in the Japan Organ Transplantation Network have been increasing since the Japanese organ transplant law was revised in July 2010.
Figure 2
Figure 2
By the end of 2019, lung transplantation had been performed in 760 patients and LDLLT had been performed in 234 patients (30.8%). CLT, cadaveric lung transplantation; LDLLT, living-donor lung transplantation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Indications for CLT and LDLLT. CLT, cadaveric lung transplantation; LDLLT, living-donor lung transplantation; ILD, interstitial lung disease; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; LAM, lymphangioleiomyomatosis; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; BE, bronchiectasis; DPB, diffuse panbronchiolitis; CLAD, chronic lung allograft dysfunction; BO, bronchiolitis obliterans; LCH, Langerhans cell histiocytosis; CF, cystic fibrosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The 5- and 10-year survival rates after LDLLT and CLT in Kyoto University. LDLLT, living-donor lobar lung transplantation; CLT, cadaveric lung transplantation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Date’s formula for functional size matching between a living-donor lobar graft and a recipient. FVC, forced vital capacity; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension.

References

    1. Sato M, Okada Y, Oto T, et al. Registry of the Japanese Society of Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation: official Japanese lung transplantation report, 2014. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;62:594-601. 10.1007/s11748-014-0418-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Starnes VA, Woo MS, MacLaughlin EF, et al. Comparison of outcomes between living donor and cadaveric lung transplantation in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2279-83; discussion 2283-4. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01155-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Date H, Aoe M, Nagahiro I, et al. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation for various lung diseases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:476-81. 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00235-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Date H. Living-related lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:3362-3371. 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.152 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Date H, Sato M, Aoyama A, et al. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation provides similar survival to cadaveric lung transplantation even for very ill patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;47:967-72. 10.1093/ejcts/ezu350 - DOI - PubMed