Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 26;10(1):1-21.
doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474. eCollection 2022.

Developing an open science 'mindset'

Affiliations
Review

Developing an open science 'mindset'

Martin S Hagger. Health Psychol Behav Med. .

Abstract

Background: Identification of widespread biases present in reported research findings in many scientific disciplines, including psychology, such as failures to replicate and the likely extensive application of questionable research practices, has raised serious concerns over the reliability and trustworthiness of scientific research. This has led to the development of, and advocacy for, 'open science' practices, including data, materials, analysis, and output sharing, pre-registration of study predictions and analysis plans, and increased access to published research findings. Implementation of such practices has been enthusiastic in some quarters, but literacy in, and adoption of, these practices has lagged behind among many researchers in the scientific community.

Advances: In the current article I propose that researchers adopt an open science 'mindset', a comprehensive approach to open science predicated on researchers' operating under the basic assumption that, wherever possible, open science practices will be a central component of all steps of their research projects. The primary, defining feature of the mindset is a commitment to open science principles in all research projects from inception to dissemination. Other features of the mindset include the assumption that all components of research projects (e.g. pre-registered hypotheses, protocols, materials, analysis plans, data, and output) will be accessible broadly; pro-active selection of open fora to disseminate research components and findings; open and transparent dissemination of reports of the research findings in advance of, and after, formal publication; and active promotion of open science practices through education, modeling, and advocacy.

Conclusion: The open science mindset is a 'farm to fork' approach to open science aimed at promoting comprehensive quality in application of open science, and widening participation in open science practices so that they become the norm in research in health psychology and behavioral medicine going forward.

Keywords: Open science; data sharing; pre-registration; replication crisis; research transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š, Benjamin, D., … Newell, B. R. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association . (2021). Open science at APA. Retrieved September 1, 2021, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/open-science
    1. Anvari, F., & Lakens, D. (2018). The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 266–286. doi:10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822 - DOI
    1. Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. doi:10.1037/amp0000191 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armeni, K., Brinkman, L., Carlsson, R., Eerland, A., Fijten, R., Fondberg, R., … Zurita-Milla, R. (2021). Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 605–611. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab039 - DOI