Developing an open science 'mindset'
- PMID: 34993003
- PMCID: PMC8725925
- DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474
Developing an open science 'mindset'
Abstract
Background: Identification of widespread biases present in reported research findings in many scientific disciplines, including psychology, such as failures to replicate and the likely extensive application of questionable research practices, has raised serious concerns over the reliability and trustworthiness of scientific research. This has led to the development of, and advocacy for, 'open science' practices, including data, materials, analysis, and output sharing, pre-registration of study predictions and analysis plans, and increased access to published research findings. Implementation of such practices has been enthusiastic in some quarters, but literacy in, and adoption of, these practices has lagged behind among many researchers in the scientific community.
Advances: In the current article I propose that researchers adopt an open science 'mindset', a comprehensive approach to open science predicated on researchers' operating under the basic assumption that, wherever possible, open science practices will be a central component of all steps of their research projects. The primary, defining feature of the mindset is a commitment to open science principles in all research projects from inception to dissemination. Other features of the mindset include the assumption that all components of research projects (e.g. pre-registered hypotheses, protocols, materials, analysis plans, data, and output) will be accessible broadly; pro-active selection of open fora to disseminate research components and findings; open and transparent dissemination of reports of the research findings in advance of, and after, formal publication; and active promotion of open science practices through education, modeling, and advocacy.
Conclusion: The open science mindset is a 'farm to fork' approach to open science aimed at promoting comprehensive quality in application of open science, and widening participation in open science practices so that they become the norm in research in health psychology and behavioral medicine going forward.
Keywords: Open science; data sharing; pre-registration; replication crisis; research transparency.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Similar articles
-
Open science practices in the false memory literature.Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1115-1127. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108. Epub 2024 Aug 5. Memory. 2024. PMID: 39101456
-
Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.Infant Child Dev. 2024 Jan-Feb;33(1):e2315. doi: 10.1002/icd.2315. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Infant Child Dev. 2024. PMID: 38425545 Free PMC article.
-
The landscape of open science in behavioral addiction research: Current practices and future directions.J Behav Addict. 2023 Oct 5;12(4):862-870. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00052. Print 2023 Dec 22. J Behav Addict. 2023. PMID: 38141055 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 23;8(2):e001282. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001282. eCollection 2022. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022. PMID: 35722044 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Social cognition theories and behavior change in COVID-19: A conceptual review.Behav Res Ther. 2022 Jul;154:104095. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104095. Epub 2022 Apr 12. Behav Res Ther. 2022. PMID: 35605335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seeing oneself as a data reuser: How subjectification activates the drivers of data reuse in science.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0272153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272153. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35980953 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Jun;48(6):764-777. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01494-7. Epub 2024 Mar 11. Int J Obes (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38467727 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting registered nurses' participation and utilisation of clinical research in Namibia.Curationis. 2025 Feb 25;48(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2695. Curationis. 2025. PMID: 40035111 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in authoritarianism before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparisons of latent means across East and West Germany, gender, age, and education.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:941466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941466. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35959026 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychological Association . (2021). Open science at APA. Retrieved September 1, 2021, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/open-science
-
- Anvari, F., & Lakens, D. (2018). The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 266–286. doi:10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822 - DOI
-
- Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. doi:10.1037/amp0000191 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Armeni, K., Brinkman, L., Carlsson, R., Eerland, A., Fijten, R., Fondberg, R., … Zurita-Milla, R. (2021). Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 605–611. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab039 - DOI