Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 9;5(4):txab225.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txab225. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Innovative strategies for managing swine welfare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iowa

Affiliations

Innovative strategies for managing swine welfare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iowa

Anna K Johnson et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic on March 11, 2020 by the World Health Organization and its impact on animal agriculture in the United States was undeniable. By April, COVID-19 resulted in the simultaneous closure or reduced operations of many meat processing plants in the upper Midwest, leading to supply chain disruptions. In Iowa, the leading pork production and processing state, these disruptions caused producer uncertainty, confusion, and stress, including time-sensitive challenges for maintaining animal care. The Iowa Resource Coordination Center (IRCC) was quickly created and launched by the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS). The IRCC included public representation from the Iowa Pork Producers Association (IPPA), Iowa Pork Industry Center (IPIC), and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, and private partners including producers, veterinarians, and technical specialists. Supporting swine welfare, the IRCC provided information on management strategies, dietary alterations to slow pig growth, alternative markets, on-farm euthanasia, and mass depopulation under veterinary oversight. In a crisis, Iowa created a model that reacted to producers' pragmatic, mental and emotional needs. This model could be quickly replicated with an introduction of foreign animal disease.

Keywords: animal care; coordination; mental-support; resources; tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appleby, M. C., and Stokes T.. . 2008. Why should we care about nonhuman animals during times of crisis? J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 11:90–97. doi: 10.1080/10888700801925612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arluke, A. 1994. Managing emotions in an animal shelter. In: Manning, A., and Serpell D.A., editors, Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 145–165.
    1. AVMA. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2019. Swine. In: Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals; p. 40–47. Available from https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/AVMA-Guidelines-for-t... [accessed September 28, 2021].
    1. Baysinger, A., Senn M., Genhardt J., Rademacher C., and Pairis-Garcia M.. . 2021. A case study of ventilation shutdown with the addition of high temperature and humidity for depopulation of pigs. JAVMA. 259:415–424. doi: 10.2460/javma.259.4.415. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourque, T. 2017. One welfare. Can. Vet. J. 58:217–218. PMCID: PMC5302194. PMID: 28246408. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources