Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;26(3):2353-2370.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04361-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews

Yassir A Yassir  1   2 , Sarah A Nabbat  3 , Grant T McIntyre  4 , David R Bearn  4
Affiliations
Review

Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews

Yassir A Yassir et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the available evidence regarding clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment (CAT).

Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for systematic reviews investigating effectiveness of CAT published up to July 15, 2021. This was accomplished using different electronic databases. No language restriction was applied. Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two authors independently. Information was categorized and narratively synthesized for the key findings from moderate and high-quality reviews.

Results: A total of 361 potentially eligible reviews were identified. After excluding the non-relevant/low-quality reviews, 18 systematic reviews were included. CAT was found to be effective for mild to moderate malocclusions, and was associated with inferior outcomes when treating severe cases or with achieving specific tooth movements. There were conflicting results regarding treatment duration; however, CAT may be associated with shorter treatment in mild to moderate cases. Relapse was greater with CAT, while periodontal health was better. The risk of root resorption tended to be lower with CAT. Regarding pain, the results were unclear, although CAT was found to be more comfortable and associated with a reduced impact on eating and chewing.

Conclusions: The level of evidence regarding CAT is moderate; hence, further high-quality randomized clinical trials are required. Evidence supports use of aligners as an alternate to fixed appliances in patients with mild-to-moderate malocclusion but not in severe cases. Advancement in technology could enhance the accuracy of CAT in delivering planned outcomes.

Clinical relevance: CAT can be used effectively for selected cases with mild to moderate malocclusion.

Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246855.

Keywords: Clear aligner; Orthodontic appliances; Overview of systematic reviews; Removable appliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bollen A-M, Cunha-Cruz J, Bakko DW, Huang GJ, Hujoel PP (2008) The effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: a systematic review of controlled evidence. J Am Dent Assoc 139(4):413–422. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ren Y, Jongsma MA, Mei L, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2014) Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation: a potential public health threat? Clin Oral Investig 18(7):1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1240-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandić MZ, Popović B, Carkić J, Nikolić N, Glišić B (2014) Changes in subgingival microflora after placement and removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. Srp Arh Celok Lek 142(5–6):301–305. https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH1406301Z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujiyama K, Honjo T, Suzuki M, Matsuoka S, Deguchi T (2014) Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy. Prog Orthod 15(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJF, Willershausen B (2015) Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patient’s satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 15(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0060-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources