Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;51(2):1173-1185.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02196-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Public Perceptions of Child Pornography and Child Pornography Consumers

Affiliations

Public Perceptions of Child Pornography and Child Pornography Consumers

Chad M S Steel et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Understanding the public's perceptions of child pornography helps identify gaps in awareness and knowledge, impacts legislative decision making, quantifies stigmatization, and provides a baseline for identifying differences between lay and offender populations for clinical purposes. This research provides a comprehensive public survey assessing these issues. An Internet-based sample of 524 adults (mean age = 47 years, 51% female) within the USA were asked about their understanding and beliefs related to child pornography and individuals who view child pornography. The questions covered three topic areas-general perceptions of child pornography, endorsement of child pornography beliefs, and opinions related to the legality of various forms of child pornography as well as the decision making related to sentencing and sex offender registration for child pornography consumers. The research found that the public viewed these offenses as more severe than most other crimes and that there was an overestimation by the public of risks related to recidivism and contact offending. Additionally, the research found that there was support for most of the current sentencing guidelines in the USA, including sex offender registration, and that there was limited support for treatment over incarceration.

Keywords: Child pornography; Lay perceptions; Risk assessment; Sex offender registration; Stigmatization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Public perceptions of child pornography consumers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
General perceptions of child pornography
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Agreement with child pornography illegality for non-traditional child pornography
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Agreement with child pornography sentencing guidelines and restrictions

References

    1. Aust CF, Zillmann D. Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 1996;73(4):787–803. doi: 10.1177/107769909607300403. - DOI
    1. Babchishin KM, Hanson RK, Hermann CA. The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2011;23(1):92–123. doi: 10.1177/1079063210370708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boas TC, Christenson DP, Glick DM. Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, mechanical turk, and qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods. 2020;8(2):232–250. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2018.28. - DOI
    1. Bouffard JA, Askew LN. Time-series analyses of the impact of sex offender registration and notification law implementation and subsequent modifications on rates of sexual offenses. Crime & Delinquency. 2019;65(11):1483–1512. doi: 10.1177/0011128717722010. - DOI
    1. Brown S. Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 1999;4(2):239–252. doi: 10.1348/135532599167879. - DOI