Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 May 1;51(4):20210335.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210335. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

CBCT in dental age estimation: A systematic review and meta analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

CBCT in dental age estimation: A systematic review and meta analysis

Rizky Merdietio Boedi et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of dental age estimation methods in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the correlation between dental (DA) and chronological (CA) ages.

Methods: The scientific literature was searched in six databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, SciELO, and OATD). Only observational studies were selected. Within each study, the outcomes of interest were (I) the quantified reproducibility of the method (κ statistics and Intraclass correlation coefficient); and (II) the correlation (r) between the dental and chronological ages. A random-effect three-level meta-analysis was conducted alongside moderator analysis based on methods, arch (maxillary/mandibular), population, and number of roots.

Results: From 671 studies, 39 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with one study reporting two different methods. The methods used in the studies were divided into metric (n = 17), volumetric (n = 20), staging (n = 2), and atlas (n = 1). All studies reported high examiner reproducibility. Group 1 (metric and volumetric) provided a high inverse weighted r ([Formula: see text] = -0.71, CI [-0.79,-0.61]), and Group 2 (staging) provided a medium-weighted r ([Formula: see text] = 0.49, CI [0.44, 0.53]). Moderator analysis on Group one did not show statistically significant differences between methods, tooth position, arch, and number of roots. An exception was detected in the analysis based on population (Southeast Asia, [Formula: see text] = -0.89, CI [-0.94,-0.81]).

Conclusion: There is high evidence that CBCT methods are reproducible and reliable in dental age estimation. Quantitative metric and volumetric analysis demonstrated better performance in predicting chronological age than staging. Future studies exploring population-specific variability for age estimation with metric and volumetric CBCT analysis may prove beneficial.

Keywords: Age Determination by Teeth; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Forensic dentistry; radiology; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart for the systematic review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001; 19: 9–17. - PubMed
    1. Pinchi V, Pradella F, Buti J, Baldinotti C, Focardi M, Norelli GA. A new age estimation procedure based on the 3d cbct study of the pulp cavity and hard tissues of the teeth for forensic purposes: a pilot study. J Forensic Leg Med 2015; 36: 150–57: S1752-928X(15)00182-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G. Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: does a bayesian approach outperform regression models to discriminate between juveniles and adults? Int J Legal Med 2010; 124: 35–42. doi: 10.1007/s00414-009-0329-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engebretsen L, Steffen K, Bahr R, Broderick C, Dvorak J, Janarv P-M, et al. . The international olympic committee consensus statement on age determination in high-level young athletes. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 476–84. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 28, 1995; 74: 175–85. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-g - DOI - PubMed