Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01494-5.

Development of a data classification system for preterm birth cohort studies: the RECAP Preterm project

Affiliations

Development of a data classification system for preterm birth cohort studies: the RECAP Preterm project

Deborah Bamber et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: The small sample sizes available within many very preterm (VPT) longitudinal birth cohort studies mean that it is often necessary to combine and harmonise data from individual studies to increase statistical power, especially for studying rare outcomes. Curating and mapping data is a vital first step in the process of data harmonisation. To facilitate data mapping and harmonisation across VPT birth cohort studies, we developed a custom classification system as part of the Research on European Children and Adults born Preterm (RECAP Preterm) project in order to increase the scope and generalisability of research and the evaluation of outcomes across the lifespan for individuals born VPT.

Methods: The multidisciplinary consortium of expert clinicians and researchers who made up the RECAP Preterm project participated in a four-phase consultation process via email questionnaire to develop a topic-specific classification system. Descriptive analyses were calculated after each questionnaire round to provide pre- and post- ratings to assess levels of agreement with the classification system as it developed. Amendments and refinements were made to the classification system after each round.

Results: Expert input from 23 clinicians and researchers from the RECAP Preterm project aided development of the classification system's topic content, refining it from 10 modules, 48 themes and 197 domains to 14 modules, 93 themes and 345 domains. Supplementary classifications for target, source, mode and instrument were also developed to capture additional variable-level information. Over 22,000 individual data variables relating to VPT birth outcomes have been mapped to the classification system to date to facilitate data harmonisation. This will continue to increase as retrospective data items are mapped and harmonised variables are created.

Conclusions: This bespoke preterm birth classification system is a fundamental component of the RECAP Preterm project's web-based interactive platform. It is freely available for use worldwide by those interested in research into the long term impact of VPT birth. It can also be used to inform the development of future cohort studies.

Keywords: Classification system; Data harmonisation; Metadata; Preterm birth cohort studies; RECAP preterm; Very preterm birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

the authors declare that they have no competing interests

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hierarchical tree structure of the RECAP Preterm classification system showing Module (top level), Themes (second level), Domains (third level) and three variables mapped to Domain 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Structure of the consultation process used to assess the appropriateness of the RECAP Preterm classification system to VPT cohort data
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
RECAP Preterm classification system structure with supplementary classifications for target, source, mode and instrument
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Example of a mapped data variable using the RECAP Preterm classification system

References

    1. Euro-Peristat Project. European perinatal health report. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015, 2018. Available: http:// www.europeristat.com/index.php/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-.... htm (20th July 2020, date last accessed).
    1. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:261–269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolke D, Johnson S, Mendonca M. The life course consequences of very preterm birth. Ann Rev Dev Psychol. 2019;1:69–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084804. - DOI
    1. Johnson S, Marlow N. Early and long-term outcome of extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:97–102. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309581. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fortier I, Doiron D, Little J, et al. Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(5):1314–1328. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources