Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):13.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03974-6.

The H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF algorithms for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Affiliations

The H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF algorithms for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Shiro Amanai et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Exercise intolerance is a primary manifestation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with abnormal hemodynamics and a poor quality of life. Two multiparametric scoring systems have been proposed to diagnose HFpEF. This study sought to determine the performance of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings of intracardiac pressures during exercise in subjects with dyspnea on exertion referred for bicycle stress echocardiography. In a subset, simultaneous expired gas analysis was performed to measure the peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Patients with HFpEF (n = 83) and controls without HF (n = 104) were enrolled. The H2FPEF score was obtainable for all patients while the HFA-PEFF score could not be calculated for 23 patients (feasibility 88%). Both H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores correlated with a higher E/e' ratio (r = 0.49 and r = 0.46), lower systolic tricuspid annular velocity (r = - 0.44 and = - 0.24), and lower cardiac output (r = - 0.28 and r = - 0.24) during peak exercise. Peak VO2 and exercise duration decreased with an increase in H2FPEF scores (r = - 0.40 and r = - 0.32). The H2FPEF score predicted a reduced aerobic capacity (AUC 0.71, p = 0.0005), but the HFA-PEFF score did not (p = 0.07). These data provide insights into the role of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in patients presenting with exertional dyspnea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores among all participants. The H2FPEF score was more likely to classify subjects into a low or intermediate probability while the HFA-PEFF score categorized them as a high probability.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations between echocardiographic measures and exercise capacity. Decreases in mitral annular e′ velocity and cardiac output (CO) during exercise were moderately correlated with lower peak oxygen consumption (VO2). HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlations between HFpEF diagnostic algorithms and exercise capacity. The H2FPEF score was correlated with peak VO2, but the HFA-PEFF score was not. Abbreviations as in Fig. 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver-operating characteristic curves of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores to predict impaired exercise capacity. AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Peak oxygen consumption according to the HFA-PEFF domain scores. (A) Peak VO2 did not differ among the HFA-PEFF functional domain scores. (B) Peak VO2 was similar among the HFA-PEFF morphological domain scores. (C) In contrast, patients with a natriuretic peptide domain of 2 points displayed lower peak VO2 compared to the other groups. *p < 0.05 vs. 0 point, #p < 0.05 vs. 1 point. Abbreviations as in Fig. 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borlaug BA. Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:559–573. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0363-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haykowsky MJ, et al. Determinants of exercise intolerance in elderly heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58:265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Obokata M, et al. Haemodynamics, dyspnoea, and pulmonary reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:2810–2821. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy268. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reddy YNV, et al. Quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Importance of obesity, functional capacity, and physical inactivity. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020;22:1009–1018. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1788. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reddy YNV, Carter RE, Obokata M, Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. A simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2018;138:861–870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types