Harm reduction in tobacco control: where do we draw the line?

Abstract

With substance abuse, harm reduction refers to reducing or replacing use of a harmful product with a less risky agent. But many advertised "non-pharmaceutical" harm reduction alternatives for tobacco smoking are problematic. Studies have revealed inconclusive results using agents including chewing tobacco and e-cigarettes to quit smoking and have demonstrated continued use of these agents. Many smoking harm reduction agents pose other health risks not found in traditional tobacco smoking. Given these limitations, efforts should focus on promoting nicotine replacement therapy, and other pharmacologic agents with a better chance of producing sustained smoking cessation. To address the harmful nature of many tobacco replacement products, public health should focus on regulating these alternatives with the same stringency as tobacco, and social marketing efforts should target evidence-based and safer pharmaceutical grade or behavioural alternatives.

Keywords: Chewing tobacco; Harm reduction; Opioids; Public health; Snus; e-Cigarettes.