Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;200(1):21-29.
doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00506-x. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Combined Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema in the IPF-PRO Registry

Affiliations

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Combined Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema in the IPF-PRO Registry

Hyun J Kim et al. Lung. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of concomitant emphysema on outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

Methods: The IPF-PRO Registry is a US registry of patients with IPF. The presence of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) at enrollment was determined by investigators' review of an HRCT scan. Associations between emphysema and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Of 934 patients, 119 (12.7%) had CPFE. Compared with patients with IPF alone, patients with CPFE were older (median 72 vs 70 years); higher proportions were current/former smokers (88.2% vs 63.7%), used oxygen with activity (49.6% vs 31.9%) or at rest (30.8% vs 18.4%), had congestive heart failure (13.6% vs 4.8%) and had prior respiratory hospitalization (25.0% vs 16.7%); they had higher FVC (median 71.8 vs 69.4% predicted) and lower DLco (median 35.3 vs 43.6% predicted). In patients with CPFE and IPF alone, respectively, at 1 year, rates of death or lung transplant were 17.5% (95% CI: 11.7, 25.8) and 11.2% (9.2, 13.6) and rates of hospitalization were 21.6% (14.6, 29.6) and 20.6% (17.9, 23.5). There were no significant associations between emphysema and any outcome after adjustment for baseline variables. No baseline variable predicted outcomes better in IPF alone than in CPFE.

Conclusion: Approximately 13% of patients in the IPF-PRO Registry had CPFE. Physiologic characteristics and comorbidities of patients with CPFE differed from those of patients with IPF alone, but the presence of emphysema did not drive outcomes after adjustment for baseline covariates.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511; registered August 5, 2013.

Keywords: Hospitalization; Interstitial lung disease; Mortality; Pulmonary fibrosis; Respiratory function tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HJK has no disclosures. LDS, MLN, ASH are employees of the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), which receives funding support from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, to co-ordinate the IPF-PRO/ILD-PRO Registry. DLH reports research fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. LDM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Genentech. SB is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. TBL was an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc at the time this research was conducted. DAC reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Genentech.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier plot of time to death, lung transplant, or hospitalization by presence of emphysema at enrollment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations between emphysema at enrollment and clinical outcomes.aAdjustment variables included in the models were as follows (all at enrollment): age, BMI, FVC % predicted, DLco % predicted, oxygen use at rest, and history of coronary artery disease or heart failure for time to death. Age, BMI, FEV1 % predicted, FVC % predicted, DLco % predicted, oxygen use at rest, oxygen use with activity, and prior diagnosis of IPF (before referral to enrolling center) for time to lung transplant. BMI, FEV1 % predicted, and oxygen at rest for time to hospitalization. Age, BMI, FEV1 % predicted, FVC % predicted, DLco % predicted, oxygen use at rest, oxygen use with activity, history of coronary artery disease or heart failure, and prior diagnosis of IPF (before referral to enrolling center) for time to death or lung transplant and for time to death, lung transplant or hospitalization

References

    1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(5):e44–e68535. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doubková M, Švancara J, Svoboda M, et al. EMPIRE Registry, Czech part: impact of demographics, pulmonary function and HRCT on survival and clinical course in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(4):1526–1535. doi: 10.1111/crj.12700. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cottin V, Nunes H, Brillet PY, et al. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a distinct underrecognised entity. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(4):586–593. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00021005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ryerson CJ, Hartman T, Elicker BM, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2013;144(1):234–240. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacob J, Bartholmai BJ, Rajagopalan S, et al. Functional and prognostic effects when emphysema complicates idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(1):1700379. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00379-2017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data