Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;26(6):1350-1357.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03338-6. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

"No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States

Pari Chowdhary  1 , Anna Newton-Levinson  2 , Roger Rochat  2
Affiliations

"No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States

Pari Chowdhary et al. Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Movements to stem abortion accessibility and provision are underway across the southern United States. Preserving access to safe abortion requires a steady maternal health workforce. Targeted laws and limiting environments have contributed to a regional dearth of abortion providers. This study evaluates the consequences of restrictive environments for the abortion workforce to inform strategies to reduce the provider shortage in the South.

Methods: We recruited twelve physicians using purposive sampling and interviewed them on their motivations and experiences practicing in the South. We employed grounded theory analysis to translate their perspectives into recommendations for provider recruitment and retention.

Results: Abortion providers identified challenges relating to restrictive legislation, institutional separation of abortion from other medical services, training unavailability, safety concerns, identity struggles, and marginalization within their profession. This contributed to providers widely experiencing stigma and isolation within their work and life environments. Their motivations for practicing in the South despite these challenges included wanting to be impactful in areas of high need, combating health access disparites, and having personal ties to the region. Providers' suggested increasing regional networking and training opportunities, creating an information clearinghouse, and offering additional compensation to better support their work. We conceptualized these findings into a framework detailing the challenges, impacts and opportunities for abortion provision in the southern United States.

Conclusions for practice: Our recommendations for provider recruitment and retention include cooperation between professional organizations, training programs, and healthcare institutions to create opportunities for training and networking and encourage abortion-supportive organizational and policy environments.

Keywords: Abortion providers; Recruitment; Retention; South/Southern United States; Workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework summarizing the challenges affecting abortion providers practicing in the southern United States, their associated impacts, and potential opportunities to mitigate them
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bahn K, Kugler A, Mahoney M, Corley D, McGrew A. Linking Reproductive Health Care Access to Labor Market Opportunities for Women. Research Report. Center for American Progress; 2018.
    1. Freedman L. Willing and Unable: Doctors' Constraints in Abortion Care. Vanderbilt University Press; 2010.
    1. Fuentes L, Jerman J. Distance traveled to obtain clinical abortion care in the United States and reasons for clinic choice. Journal of Women's Health. 2019;28(12):1623–1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenberg M, Herbitter C, Gawinski BA, Fletcher J, Gold M. Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers. Family Medicine. 2012;44(7):493. - PubMed
    1. Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Potter JE. The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation. Contraception. 2014;89(2):73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed