Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;29(20):29967-29975.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17988-0. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

Indoxacarb effects on non-target predator, Podisus distinctus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Affiliations

Indoxacarb effects on non-target predator, Podisus distinctus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Carlos Henrique Batista et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Forestry pest management includes biological and chemical methods of pest control. Using insecticides and natural enemies can be compatible in forest pest management programs. The compatibility of the predatory stink bug Podisus distinctus with the insecticide indoxacarb, used in forestry, needs to be evaluated in Brazil. This study investigated the mortality, survival, respiration, preference, prey consumption, and locomotor activity of P. distinctus adults exposed to indoxacarb. In concentration-mortality bioassays, the lethality of indoxacarb (LC50 = 2.62 g L-1 and LC90 = 6.11 g L-1) was confirmed in P. distinctus adults. The survival rate was 100% in predator insects not exposed to indoxacarb, declining to 40.7% in predator insects exposed to 2.62 g L-1 and 0.1% in predators treated with 6.11 g L-1. Indoxacarb reduced the respiration of P. distinctus from 18.45 to 14.41 µL CO2 h-1 at 2.62 g L-1 for up to 3 h after insecticide exposure, inhibiting food consumption and displaying hyperexcitation. The harmful effects of indoxacarb to the natural enemy suggest that it should be better assessed for use with P. distinctus for pest management in forestry.

Keywords: Forestry; Hazardous chemical; Non-target organism; Predatory bug; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnó J, Gabarra R (2011) Side effects of selected insecticides on the Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae). J Pest Sci 84:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-011-0384-z - DOI
    1. Arthidoro de Castro MB, Martínez LC, Cossolin JFS, Serra RS, Serrão JE (2020) Cytotoxic effects on the midgut, hypopharyngeal glands and brain of Apis mellifera honey bee workers exposed to chronic concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin. Chemosphere 248:126075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126075 - DOI
    1. Barrat BIP, Howarth FG, Withers TM, Kean JM, Ridley GS (2010) Progress in risk assessment for classical biological control. Biol Control 52:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.02.012 - DOI
    1. Biondi A, Desneux N, Siscaro G, Zappalà L (2012) Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere 87:803–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.082 - DOI
    1. Bostanian NJ, Akalach M (2004) The contact toxicity of indoxacarb and five other insecticides to Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), beneficials used in the greenhouse industry. Pest Manag Sci 60:1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.938 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources