How paediatric drug development and use could benefit from OMICs: A c4c expert group white paper
- PMID: 34997627
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15216
How paediatric drug development and use could benefit from OMICs: A c4c expert group white paper
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy in children, particularly preterms, neonates and infants, is limited by a paucity of good-quality data from prospective clinical drug trials. A specific challenge is the establishment of valid biomarkers. OMICs technologies may support these efforts by complementary information about targeted and nontargeted molecules through systematic characterization and quantitation of biological samples. OMICs technologies comprise at least genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and microbiomics in addition to the patient's phenotype. OMICs technologies are in part hypothesis-generating, allowing an in depth understanding of disease pathophysiology and pharmacological mechanisms. Application of OMICs technologies in paediatrics faces major challenges before routine adoption. First, developmental processes need to be considered, including a subdivision into specific age groups as developmental changes clearly impact OMICs data. Second, compared to the adult population, the number of patients is limited as are the type and amount of necessary biomaterial, especially in neonates and preterms. Thus, advanced trial designs and biostatistical methods, noninvasive biomarkers, innovative biobanking concepts including data and samples from healthy children, as well as analytical approaches (eg liquid biopsies) should be addressed to overcome these obstacles. The ultimate goal is to link OMICs technologies with innovative analysis tools, such as artificial intelligence at an early stage. The use of OMICs data based on a feasible approach will contribute to the identification complex phenotypes and subpopulations of patients to improve the development of medicines for children with potential economic advantages.
Keywords: OMICS technology; clinical trials; epigenomics; paediatrics; pharmacogenomics.
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lonergan M, Senn SJ, McNamee C, et al. Defining drug response for stratified medicine. Drug Discov Today. 2017;22(1):173-179. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.10.016
-
- Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138(1):103-141. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007
-
- Abdullah-Koolmees H, van Keulen AM, Nijenhuis M, Deneer VHM. Pharmacogenetics Guidelines: Overview and Comparison of the DPWG, CPIC, CPNDS, and RNPGx Guidelines. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:595219. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.595219
-
- Osanlou O, Pirmohamed M, Daly AK. Chapter Seven - Pharmacogenetics of Adverse Drug Reactions. In: Brøsen K, Damkier P, eds. Advances in Pharmacology: Pharmacogenetics. Vol. 83 Academic Press; 2018:155-190.
-
- Food and Drug Administration. Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/science-and-research-drugs/table-pharmacogenom... … %20%2023%20more%20rows. Updated August 18, 2020. Accessed December 31, 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical