Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;38(2):105-116.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12730. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

Implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss: A systematic review

Frej Nørgaard Petersen  1 , Simon Storgård Jensen  1   2 , Morten Dahl  1
Affiliations

Implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss: A systematic review

Frej Nørgaard Petersen et al. Dent Traumatol. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background/aims: Treatment after traumatic tooth loss is challenging and is currently guided by expert opinion and the individual patient situation. The aim of this study was to provide an overview on the outcome of dental implant treatment in the anterior maxilla after traumatic tooth loss, based on a systematic review of the existing evidence.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed on PubMed, Cochran Library and Web of Science following the PRISMA guidelines based on a structured research question (PICO). All clinical studies of five patients or more with follow-up of at least 1 year after implant loading were included. Patients were at least 18 years of age. Cohen's Kappa-coefficient was calculated. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess the quality of the included studies. Descriptive statistical methods were applied.

Results: Nine hundred and ninety-nine articles were identified through the systematic search. Finally, six articles were eligible for inclusion. The studies comprised prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series. From these, 96 patients with 120 implants were included. The age ranged from 18 to 59 years. The survival rates of implants and superstructures were 97% and 95%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Mean marginal bone resorption was 0.56 mm (range 0.21-1.30 mm). Complication rates were 7% and 11% on implant and superstructure level, respectively. Patient-reported outcome measures and objective evaluations showed a high level of satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome. Bone augmentation was performed in 60 implant sites. Three patients underwent pre-surgical orthodontic treatment. The maxillary central incisor was the most frequently replaced tooth (70%).

Conclusions: This systematic review revealed a low level of evidence on the outcome of dental implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss. Systematic reporting of treatment outcomes of tooth replacements after dental trauma is highly encouraged to further guide dentists for the benefit of these challenging patients.

Keywords: dental implants; maxilla; maxillofacial injuries; tooth loss; traumatic dental injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L. Classification, etiology and epidemiology. In: Andreasen FM, Andersson L, editors. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 5th Edn. Stomatology Edu Journal. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2019. p. 252-94.
    1. Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries-a 12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:603-11.
    1. Petti S, Glendor U, Andersson L. World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta-analysis-one billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2018;34:71-86.
    1. Skaare AB, Jacobsen I. Dental injuries in Norwegians aged 7-18 years. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19:67-71.
    1. Lauridsen E, Hermann NV, Gerds TA, Kreiborg S, Andreasen JO. Pattern of traumatic dental injuries in the permanent dentition among children, adolescents, and adults. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:358-63.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources