UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients
- PMID: 34998046
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.009
UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients
Abstract
Aim: To determine the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and cost of UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.
Patients and methods: In this prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study, patients intended for treatment with irinotecan were pre-therapeutically genotyped for UGT1A1∗28 and UGT1A1∗93. Homozygous variant carriers (UGT1A1 poor metabolisers; PMs) received an initial 30% dose reduction. The primary endpoint was incidence of febrile neutropenia in the first two cycles of treatment. Toxicity in UGT1A1 PMs was compared to a historical cohort of UGT1A1 PMs treated with full dose therapy, and to UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy in the current study. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, feasibility, and costs.
Results: Of the 350 evaluable patients, 31 (8.9%) patients were UGT1A1 PM and received a median 30% dose reduction. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in this group was 6.5% compared to 24% in historical UGT1A1 PMs (P = 0.04) and was comparable to the incidence in UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy. Systemic exposure of SN-38 of reduced dosing in UGT1A1 PMs was still slightly higher compared to a standard-dosed irinotecan patient cohort (difference: +32%). Cost analysis showed that genotype-guided dosing was cost-saving with a cost reduction of €183 per patient.
Conclusion: UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing significantly reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in UGT1A1 PM patients treated with irinotecan, results in a therapeutically effective systemic drug exposure, and is cost-saving. Therefore, UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan should be considered standard of care in order to improve individual patient safety.
Keywords: Genotyping; Irinotecan; Pharmacogenetics; Toxicity; UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; UGT.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: HLMcL declares the following potential conflicts of interest: Board of Directors: Vyant Bio; Co-Founder: Clariifi LLC; Advisor: EviCore, Total Dx Connect, and Viecure. All remaining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Re: UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients: Is it time for everyone treated with irinotecan to be tested for UGT1A1 gene polymorphism?Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jul;170:194-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.044. Epub 2022 May 31. Eur J Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35660253 No abstract available.
-
Response to letter entitled re: UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients: Is it time for everyone treated with irinotecan to be tested for UGT1A1 gene polymorphism?Eur J Cancer. 2022 Sep;172:231-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.045. Epub 2022 Jul 3. Eur J Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35793611 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
