Intraoperative Comparative Femoral Rotation Imaging: Do not Overlook Parallax
- PMID: 34999626
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002347
Intraoperative Comparative Femoral Rotation Imaging: Do not Overlook Parallax
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the degree of error due to parallax during intraoperative rotational imaging involving the distal femur.
Methods: Twelve, fresh-frozen, lower-extremity cadaveric specimens were studied. The limbs were positioned supine and rotated until the posterior femoral condyles were superimposed using a C-arm. The C-arm was then repositioned to place the femoral condyles at the anterior and posterior margins of the image intensifier. The rotation necessary to resuperimpose the femoral condyles due to parallax was recorded. A second C-arm was then used from the contralateral side to simulate the rotational imaging technique to determine the magnitude and directionality of combined parallax.
Results: All 12 specimens demonstrated parallax, resulting in rotational discrepancies. Compared with central field of view alignment, the mean rotational discrepancy was 5.6 and 5.5 degrees for anterior and posterior positions, respectively. Contralateral imaging resulted in an additive effect with rotational differences of 9.0 and 12.6 degrees for bilateral anterior and posterior positions, respectively.
Conclusions: Parallax causes rotational discrepancies with fluoroscopic imaging of the distal femur when the posterior femoral condyles are off-center in the imaging field of view. If femoral condyles are not centered when obtaining intraoperative rotational imaging of the uninjured and injured femurs, parallax can result in potentially clinically significant rotational deformity even if the femurs seem perfectly matched at the conclusion of surgery. We recommend perfectly centering of the posterior femoral condyles in the imaging field of view when obtaining lateral images of the distal femur to prevent this potentially overlooked contribution to malrotation.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:529–539.
-
- Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, et al. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:161–169.
-
- Lindsey JD, Krieg JC. Femoral malrotation following intramedullary nail fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:17–26.
-
- Jaarsma RL, van Kampen A. Rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:1100–1104.
-
- Jaarsma RL, Ongkiehong BF, Grüneberg C, et al. Compensation for rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. An analysis by plantar pressure measurements during gait. Injury. 2004;35:1270–1278.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
