Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 14;45(1):109-117.
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab402.

Loneliness in young people: a multilevel exploration of social ecological influences and geographic variation

J Marquez  1 , C Goodfellow  1 , D Hardoon  2 , J Inchley  1 , A H Leyland  1 , P Qualter  3 , S A Simpson  1 , E Long  1
Affiliations

Loneliness in young people: a multilevel exploration of social ecological influences and geographic variation

J Marquez et al. J Public Health (Oxf). .

Abstract

Background: Loneliness is a growing public health concern, yet little is known about loneliness in young people. The current study aimed to identify social ecological factors related to loneliness and examine the extent to which geographic region may account for differences in loneliness.

Methods: The data come from a cross-sectional sample of 6503 young people living in the UK. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA 3-item scale. Bivariate analyses were used to test associations between each predictor and loneliness. Multilevel models were used to identify key social ecological factors related to loneliness, and the extent to which loneliness may vary across geographic regions (local authority districts).

Results: Sociodemographic, social, health and well-being, and community factors were found to be associated with loneliness. Geographic region was associated with 5-8% of the variation in loneliness. The effect of gender, sexual orientation and minority ethnic background on loneliness differed across regions.

Conclusions: This is the first study to highlight modifiable social and community factors related to youth loneliness, and individual vulnerabilities, such as poor mental well-being. Results related to geographic differences suggest that local-level initiatives may be most appropriate in tackling loneliness, rather than wider, less contextualized national efforts.

Keywords: geographical; loneliness; multilevel modelling; social ecological; young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (2018). A Connected Society: A Strategy for Tackling Loneliness—Laying the Foundations for Change. London, England: UK Government website. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-connected-society-a-strateg... (18 January 2021, date last accessed).
    1. Shankar A, McMunn A, Banks J, Steptoe A. Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychol 2011;30(4):377–85. - PubMed
    1. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 2016;102(13):1009–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Hanratty B. Loneliness, social isolation and risk of cardiovascular disease in the English longitudinal study of ageing. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25(13):1387–96. - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015;10(2):227–37. - PubMed

Publication types