Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200451.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0451. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Dominance in humans

Affiliations
Review

Dominance in humans

Tian Chen Zeng et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Dominance captures behavioural patterns found in social hierarchies that arise from agonistic interactions in which some individuals coercively exploit their control over costs and benefits to extract deference from others, often through aggression, threats and/or intimidation. Accumulating evidence points to its importance in humans and its separation from prestige-an alternate avenue to high status in which status arises from information (e.g. knowledge, skill, etc.) or other non-rival goods. In this review, we provide an overview of the theoretical underpinnings of dominance as a concept within evolutionary biology, discuss the challenges of applying it to humans and consider alternative theoretical accounts which assert that dominance is relevant to understanding status in humans. We then review empirical evidence for its continued importance in human groups, including the effects of dominance-independently of prestige-on measurable outcomes such as social influence and reproductive fitness, evidence for specialized dominance psychology, and evidence for gender-specific effects. Finally, because human-specific factors such as norms and coalitions may place bounds on purely coercive status-attainment strategies, we end by considering key situations and contexts that increase the likelihood for dominance status to coexist alongside prestige status within the same individual, including how: (i) institutional power and authority tend to elicit dominance; (ii) dominance-enhancing traits can at times generate benefits for others (prestige); and (iii) certain dominance cues and ethology may lead to mis-attributions of prestige. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.

Keywords: cultural evolution; dominance; hierarchy; human; prestige; status.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chapais B. 2015. Competence and the evolutionary origins of status and power in humans. Hum. Nat. 26, 161-183. (10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson C, Kilduff GJ. 2009. The pursuit of status in social groups. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18, 295-298. (10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x) - DOI
    1. Durkee PK, Lukaszewski AW, Buss DM. 2020. Psychological foundations of human status allocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21 235-21 241. (10.1073/pnas.2006148117) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schjelderup-Ebbe T. 1922. Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. (Observation on the social psychology of domestic fowls.) Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorgane 88, 225-252.
    1. Wittig RM, Boesch C. 2003. Food Competition and linear dominance hierarchy among female chimpanzees of the Taï National Park. Int. J. Primatol. 24, 847-867. (10.1023/A:1024632923180) - DOI