Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;92(5):906-915.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003527. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Neurotrauma Research Panel Delphi Survey

Affiliations

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Neurotrauma Research Panel Delphi Survey

Deborah M Stein et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Background: In 2016, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine called for the development of a National Trauma Research Action Plan. The Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. Given the public health burden of injuries to the central nervous system, neurotrauma was one of 11 panels formed to address this recommendation with a gap analysis and generation of high-priority research questions.

Methods: We recruited interdisciplinary experts to identify gaps in the neurotrauma literature, generate research questions, and prioritize those questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. We conducted four Delphi rounds in which participants generated key research questions and then prioritized the importance of the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as 60% or greater of panelists agreeing on the priority category. We then coded research questions using an National Trauma Research Action Plan taxonomy of 118 research concepts, which were consistent across all 11 panels.

Results: Twenty-eight neurotrauma experts generated 675 research questions. Of these, 364 (53.9%) reached consensus, and 56 were determined to be high priority (15.4%), 303 were deemed to be medium priority (83.2%), and 5 were low priority (1.4%). The research topics were stratified into three groups-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), mild TBI (mTBI), and spinal cord injury. The number of high-priority questions for each subtopic was 46 for severe TBI (19.7%), 3 for mTBI (4.3%) and 7 for SCI (11.7%).

Conclusion: This Delphi gap analysis of neurotrauma research identified 56 high-priority research questions. There are clear areas of focus for severe TBI, mTBI, and spinal cord injury that will help guide investigators in future neurotrauma research. Funding agencies should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic Test or Criteria, Level IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Updated 2021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ . Accessed August 24, 2021.
    1. Livingston DH, Tripp T, Biggs C, Lavery RF. A fate worse than death? Long-term outcome of trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma . 2009;67:341–348.
    1. GBD 2016 traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol . 2019;18:56–87.
    1. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injury–related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ . 2017;66:1–16.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics: Mortality Data on CDC WONDER 2020. Available at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd.html . Updated December 22, 2020. Accessed August 24, 2021.

Publication types