Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 10;38(1):89-93.
doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000593.

Evaluation of Diaphragm Thickness and Stiffness Using Ultrasound and Shear-Wave Elastography

Affiliations

Evaluation of Diaphragm Thickness and Stiffness Using Ultrasound and Shear-Wave Elastography

Halit Nahit Şendur et al. Ultrasound Q. .

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to measure the thickness and stiffness of diaphragm in association with the respiratory cyclus and to assess the reproducibility of these measurements. Forty individuals who are volunteered for participating diaphragm evaluation were included in the study. Two radiologists with 14 and 15 years of experiences in abdominal ultrasound performed all examinations independently. Furthermore, 8 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were examined by only the first radiologist. Gray scale and shear-wave elastography imaging of only the right hemidiaphragm of all participants were performed. Thickness and stiffness of diaphragm were measured at the peak inspiration and end expiration phases. Intraclass correlation coefficients test was used to assess the interobserver agreement. The thickness and stiffness of diaphragm significantly increased with inspiration (P < 0.001). The mean ± SD stiffness of diaphragm in peak inspiration and end expiration phases was 51.84 ± 16.83 kPa and 38.49 ± 9.42 kPa, respectively, for the first radiologist and 49.61 ± 13.83 kPa and 37.52 ± 10.71 kPa, respectively, for the second radiologist. Intraclass correlation coefficient values for diaphragm stiffness were 0.667 and 0.736 in peak inspiration and end expiration phases, respectively. In COPD patients, there was no significant difference between stiffness measurements of respiratory phases. In conclusion, the current study revealed that diaphragm thickness and stiffness increase at inspiration, and these measurements are slightly more reproducible at the end of expiration. However, diaphragm stiffness changes between respiratory phases may not be valid for COPD patients, and this may be related to loss of force-generating capacity of diaphragm in COPD patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2002;166:518–624.
    1. Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Disorders of the respiratory muscles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2003;168:10–48.
    1. Bachasson D, Dres M, Niérat MC, et al. Diaphragm shear modulus reflects transdiaphragmatic pressure during isovolumetric inspiratory efforts and ventilation against inspiratory loading. J Appl Physiol . 2019;126:699–707.
    1. Sferrazza Papa GF, Pellegrino GM, Di Marco F, et al. A review of the ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in clinical practice. Respiration . 2016;91:403–411.
    1. Boussuges A, Rives S, Finance J, et al. Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: current approach and perspectives. World J Clin Cases . 2020;8:2408–2424.

LinkOut - more resources