Towards consensus on visual pursuit and visual fixation in patients with disorders of consciousness. A Delphi study
- PMID: 35001197
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10905-y
Towards consensus on visual pursuit and visual fixation in patients with disorders of consciousness. A Delphi study
Abstract
Background: The aim of this Delphi study was to reach consensus about definition, operationalization and assessment of visual pursuit (VP) and visual fixation (VF).
Methods: In a three-round international Delphi study, clinical and research experts on disorders of consciousness indicated their level of agreement on 87 statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus for agreement was defined by a median of 5, an interquartile range (IQR) ≤ 1, and ≥ 80% indicating moderate or strong agreement.
Results: Forty-three experts from three continents participated, 32 completed all three rounds. For VP, the consensus statements with the highest levels of agreement were on the term 'pursuit of a visual stimulus', the description 'ability to follow visually in horizontal and/or vertical plane', a duration > 2 s, tracking in horizontal and vertical planes, and a frequency of more than 2 times per assessment. For VF, consensus statements with the highest levels of agreement were on the term 'sustained VF', the description 'sustained fixation in response to a salient stimulus', a duration of > 2 s and a frequency of 2 or more times per assessment. The assessment factors with the highest levels of agreement were personalized stimuli, the use of eye tracking technology, a patient dependent time of assessment, sufficient environmental light, upright posture, and the necessity to exclude ocular/oculomotor problems.
Conclusion: This first international Delphi study on VP and VF in patients with disorders of consciousness provides provisional operational definitions and an overview of the most relevant assessment factors.
Keywords: Delphi study; Disorders of consciousness; Visual fixation; Visual pursuit.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
References
-
- Laureys S, Celesia G, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, León-Carrión J, Sannita W, Sazbon L, Schmutzhard E, von Wild K, Zeman A, Dolce G (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-68 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.349 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 330:1499–1508. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199405263302107 - DOI
-
- Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Moonen G, Laureys S (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-35 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources