Patients and family members´ perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in palliative care: A qualitative descriptive study
- PMID: 35001462
- PMCID: PMC9544242
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16192
Patients and family members´ perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in palliative care: A qualitative descriptive study
Abstract
Aims: To describe patients and family members' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in specialised palliative care.
Background: Interprofessional teamwork is essential when delivering high-quality palliative care. Little attention has been paid to patients and family members' perceptions.
Design: A qualitative descriptive design.
Methods: Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 20 palliative patients and family members (n = 19) in four palliative wards, which were collected from May 2019 to November 2019. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis. COREQ guidelines were followed.
Results: Patients' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork were described as the nature of interprofessional teamwork, a sense of community and patient participation. Family members' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork were described as the nature of interprofessional teamwork, the diverse expertise and the sense of community. Patients and family members' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork were nearly identical and were based on observed social situations or their assumptions. They trust that professionals are working interprofessionally, even if the teamwork cannot be observed. In palliative care, the nature of interprofessional care changes together with patients' condition and family members progressively need more professional support.
Conclusions: Conducting interprofessional care more openly could benefit the availability of different professionals' competence to patients and family members. In palliative care, the nature of interprofessional teamwork changes together with the patients' health condition. More information is needed about what constitutes an interprofessional framework and the required interprofessional competencies in palliative care.
Relevance to clinical practice: The findings show the importance of considering the patient's health status when interprofessional care is planned. However, professionals should recognise that a patient's weakening condition changes the focus more to the needs of the family members. It is acknowledged that IP teamwork requires time, but in PC settings, spending time on collaborative practices is not always possible.
Keywords: family members; interprofessional care; palliative care; patient; qualitative research; teamwork.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Similar articles
-
Health and social care professionals' perspective on the interprofessional competencies required in palliative care.J Interprof Care. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):218-227. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2437413. Epub 2024 Dec 16. J Interprof Care. 2025. PMID: 39676647
-
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study.J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):633-644. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15578. Epub 2020 Dec 14. J Clin Nurs. 2021. PMID: 33275801
-
An Integrative Review of Interprofessional Teamwork and Required Competence in Specialized Palliative Care.Omega (Westport). 2024 Aug;89(3):1047-1073. doi: 10.1177/00302228221085468. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Omega (Westport). 2024. PMID: 35439095 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12424. Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 24807434
-
Patients' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jun;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00121. JBI Evid Synth. 2020. PMID: 32813373
Cited by
-
Reducing Caregiver Burden Through Dyadic Support in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review Focused on Middle-Aged and Older Adults.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 16;14(16):5804. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165804. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
'So being here is. . . I feel like I'm being a social worker again, at the hospice': Using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore social workers' experiences of hospice work.Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;38(3):320-330. doi: 10.1177/02692163231220163. Epub 2024 Feb 19. Palliat Med. 2024. PMID: 38372027 Free PMC article.
-
Simulation-based learning in palliative care in postgraduate nursing education: a scoping review.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01149-w. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 36991463 Free PMC article.
-
Achievements and Barriers in Hospice and Palliative Social Work Practice: A Qualitative Study.J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 1;27(4):131-148. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.4.131. J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 39691180 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC) (2010). A National Interprofessional Competency Framework. Retrieved from https://ipcontherun.ca/wp‐content/uploads/2014/06/National‐Framework.pdf
-
- Elo, S. , Kääriäinen, M. , Kanste, O. , Pölkki, T. , Utriainen, K. , & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 10.1177/2158244014522633 - DOI
-
- European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) (2020). December). Retrieved from. https://www.eapcnet.eu/about‐us/what‐we‐do
References
-
- Official Statistics of Finland (OFS) (2021). Statistics Finland, Population structure. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/index_en.html
-
- Sanderson, C. R. , Cahill, P. J. , Phillips, J. L. , Johnson, A. , & Lobb, E. A. (2017). Patient‐centered family meetings in palliative care: a quality improvement project to explore a new model of family meetings with patients and families at the end of life. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 6(2), S195–S205. 10.21037/apm.2017.08.11 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schwandt, T. A. , Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(114), 11–25. 10.1002/ev.223 - DOI