Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 May;23(3):324-329.
doi: 10.1111/pedi.13312. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Glycemic outcomes of children 2-6 years of age with type 1 diabetes during the pediatric MiniMed™ 670G system trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Glycemic outcomes of children 2-6 years of age with type 1 diabetes during the pediatric MiniMed™ 670G system trial

Gregory P Forlenza et al. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Highly variable insulin sensitivity, susceptibility to hypoglycemia and inability to effectively communicate hypoglycemic symptoms pose significant challenges for young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Herein, outcomes during clinical MiniMed™ 670G system use were evaluated in children aged 2-6 years with T1D.

Methods: Participants (N = 46, aged 4.6 ± 1.4 years) at seven investigational centers used the MiniMed™ 670G system in Manual Mode during a two-week run-in period followed by Auto Mode during a three-month study phase. Safety events, mean A1C, sensor glucose (SG), and percentage of time spent in (TIR, 70-180 mg/dl), below (TBR, <70 mg/dl) and above (TAR, >180 mg/dl) range were assessed for the run-in and study phase and compared using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: From run-in to end of study (median 87.1% time in auto mode), mean A1C and SG changed from 8.0 ± 0.9% to 7.5 ± 0.6% (p < 0.001) and from 173 ± 24 to 161 ± 16 mg/dl (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall TIR increased from 55.7 ± 13.4% to 63.8 ± 9.4% (p < 0.001), while TBR and TAR decreased from 3.3 ± 2.5% to 3.2 ± 1.6% (p = 0.996) and 41.0 ± 14.7% to 33.0 ± 9.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Overnight TBR remained unchanged and TAR was further improved 12:00 am-6:00 am. Throughout the study phase, there were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and no serious adverse device-related events.

Conclusions: At-home MiniMed™ 670G Auto Mode use by young children safely improved glycemic outcomes compared to two-week open-loop Manual Mode use. The improvements are similar to those observed in older children, adolescents and adults with T1D using the same system for the same duration of time.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02660827.

Keywords: A1C; automated insulin delivery; hybrid closed loop; pediatric; time-in-range; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The MiniMed™ 670G system is intended for the management of type 1 diabetes in persons 7 years of age and older.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The median and 10th through 90th percentile ranges for sensor glucose (top) and basal insulin delivered (bottom) are shown for the 24‐h day of the baseline run‐in (gray band and dashed lines) and the Auto Mode‐enabled study phase (pink band and solid lines), for the intention to treat group (N = 46). Visually, and most notably during the overnight period (i.e., 9:00 pm–6:00 am), study phase automated basal insulin delivery is increased relative to preset basal insulin delivery during run‐in open loop. The more variable and increased insulin delivery with Auto Mode appear to partly underlie all percentile ranges of SG remaining within target range between approximately 5:00 am–8:00 am (i.e., waking hours). “R” is run‐in and “S” is study phase

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Writing Group for the Search for Diabetes in Youth Study Group , Dabelea D, Bell RA, et al. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007;297(24):12716‐12724. - PubMed
    1. Hamman RF, Bell RA, Dabelea D, et al. The SEARCH for diabetes in youth study: rationale, findings, and future directions. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3336‐3344. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016‐2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66‐72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dovc K, Boughton C, Tauschmann M, et al. Young children have higher variability of insulin requirements: observations during hybrid closed‐loop insulin delivery. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1344‐1347. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Streisand R, Monaghan M. Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9):520. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data