Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;26(3):287-294.
doi: 10.1111/hdi.12994. Epub 2022 Jan 9.

Cost of the quanta SC+ hemodialysis system for self-care in the United Kingdom

Affiliations
Review

Cost of the quanta SC+ hemodialysis system for self-care in the United Kingdom

Thomas W Ferguson et al. Hemodial Int. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: New personal hemodialysis systems, such as the quanta SC+, are being developed; these systems are smaller and simpler to use while providing the clearances of conventional systems. Increasing the uptake of lower-intensity assistance and full self-care dialysis may provide economic benefits to the public health payer. In the United Kingdom, most hemodialysis patients currently receive facility-based dialysis costing more than £36,350 per year including patient transport. As such, we aimed to describe the annual costs of using the SC+ hemodialysis system in the United Kingdom for 3×-weekly and 3.5×-weekly dialysis regimens, for self-care hemodialysis provided both in-center and at home.

Methods: We applied a cost minimization approach. Costs for human resources, equipment, and consumables were sourced from the dialysis machine developer (Quanta Dialysis Technologies) based upon discussions with dialysis providers. Facility overhead expenses and transport costs were taken from a review of the literature.

Findings: Annual costs associated with the use of the SC+ hemodialysis system were estimated to be £26,642 for hemodialysis provided 3× weekly as home self-care; £30,235 for hemodialysis provided 3× weekly as self-care in-center; £29,866 for hemodialysis provided 3.5× weekly as home self-care; and £36,185 for hemodialysis provided 3.5× weekly as self-care in-center.

Discussion: We found that the SC+ hemodialysis system offers improved cost-effectiveness for both 3×-weekly and 3.5×-weekly self-care dialysis performed at home or as self-care in-center versus fully assisted dialysis provided 3× weekly with conventional machines in facilities.

Keywords: cost effectiveness; dialysis; economic analysis; hemodialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gerard Harper and John E. Milad are employees of Quanta Dialysis Technologies. Dr. Paul Komenda and Thomas Ferguson are consultants to Quanta Dialysis Technologies. This study was funded by Quanta Dialysis Technologies.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of component costs by location and frequency of dialysis treatment [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UK Renal Registry . UKrenal registry 21st annual report. Bristol, UK; 2019. https://www.renalreg.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/21st_UKRR_Annual_Rep....
    1. United States Renal Data System . USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2018.
    1. CIHI . Canadian organ replacement register annual report; 2017. https://www.cihi.ca/en/corr-annual-statistics-2007-to-2016. Accessed January 5, 2018.
    1. ANZDATA Registry . ANZDATA 42nd annual report; 2019. https://www.anzdata.org.au/report/anzdata-42nd-annual-report-2019/. Accessed January 27, 2020.
    1. Ishani A, Slinin Y, Greer N, MacDonald R, Messana J, Rutks I, Wilt TJ. Comparative effectiveness of home‐based kidney dialysis versus in‐center or other outpatient kidney dialysis locations – a systematic review 2015. Available at https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/esp/kidney-dialysis.pdf - PubMed

Publication types