Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;65(11):792-797.
doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_682_21. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Comparison of sensory posterior articular nerves of the knee (SPANK) block versus infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block when added to adductor canal block for pain control and knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty---A prospective randomised trial

Affiliations

Comparison of sensory posterior articular nerves of the knee (SPANK) block versus infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block when added to adductor canal block for pain control and knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty---A prospective randomised trial

Shibani Padhy et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background and aims: Adductor canal block (ACB), though an effective procedure for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), does not provide analgesia to the posterior articular aspect of the knee joint. Infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK block) and sensory posterior articular nerves of the knee (SPANK block) are two single injection techniques that have been shown to provide effective analgesia in posterior knee pain. This study aims to compare the effect of IPACK block and SPANK block when combined with ACB for analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation in TKA.

Methods: A total of 82 patients were randomised into two groups: (1) ACB combined with IPACK, (2) ACB combined with SPANK block. The primary outcome was the pain scores from 6 h to 48 h after surgery and the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcome measures were 24 h opioid consumption, ambulation parameters like mobilisation ability, quadriceps muscle strength and patient satisfaction score at discharge.

Results: Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and on movement, duration of analgesia, total opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction were significantly better (P < 0.05%) in the IPACK group than in the SPANK block. There were no significant differences in the knee rehabilitation parameters between the blocks.

Conclusion: ACB with IPACK block offers better analgesia, less opioid consumption and better patient satisfaction with comparable knee rehabilitation parameters in the immediate postoperative period after TKA compared to ACB with SPANK block.

Keywords: Analgesia; arthroplasty; knee; nerve block; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) IPACK Block. (b) SPANK Block
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT flow diagram for patient enrolment and analysis

References

    1. Stevenson KL, Neuwirth AL, Sheth N. Perioperative pain management following total joint arthroplasty: A review and update to an institutional pain protocol. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9:40–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahal C, Kumar A, Pyati S. Advances in regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:94–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pelt CE, Anderson AW, Anderson MB, Van Dine C, Peters CL. Post-operative falls after total knee arthroplasty in patients with a femoral nerve catheter: Can we reduce the incidence? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1154–7. - PubMed
    1. Krishna V, Govil N, Tripathi M, Jain G, Goyal T, Aggarwal S. Comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block for post-operative pain relief after bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:S80–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vora MU, Nicholas TA, Kassel CA, Grant SA. Adductor canal block for knee surgical procedures: Review article. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:295–303. - PubMed