Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Learned
- PMID: 35002323
- PMCID: PMC8722541
- DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S321192
Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Learned
Abstract
Background: This is a prospective cohort study of partial breast reconstruction (PBR) with a lateral chest wall perforator flap (LCWPF) to facilitate breast conservation surgery (BCS) for women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The study was undertaken to study the clinical and cancer outcomes.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer who consented to undergo BCS with PBR with LCWPF were included in the study. A prospective database has been maintained to collect information on clinico-pathological features, complications, and follow-up. Patients were asked to complete an anonymised PROM questionnaire over the years. The hospital electronic records were interrogated for women who have completed 5 years follow-up to assess for development of recurrence/events.
Results: A total of 105 patients underwent PBR with LCWPFs between 2011 and 2018. Of these, 74% underwent cancer resection and PBR as one operation whilst 26% underwent PBR as a two-stage approach. The median tumor size on pre-op imaging was 30 mm for the one-stage approach and 39.5 mm for the two-stage approach (p-value=0.003). The complication rates were low and the re-operation rate for close margins was 10%, with 4% eventually requiring mastectomy. Good-to-excellent esthetic outcomes were reported in more than 80% of cases by patients and clinicians. The local recurrence rate (LR) was 2%, distant recurrence rate 10.5%, disease free survival (DFS) 86%, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) 89% and overall survival (OS) 94.8% at 4.5 years median follow-up. This procedure provides an effective oncological approach, avoiding mastectomy with a good-to-excellent cosmetic outcome. The follow-up data establishes the safety of this approach.
Discussion: This is the first published series of recurrence and survival data in patients undergoing PBR. We intend to continue with data collection to assess long-term outcomes beyond 10 years. The authors would recommend consideration of this technique to facilitate BCS and avoid mastectomy.
Registration: Not applicable.
Keywords: PBR; PROMs; breast cancer; breast cancer outcomes; breast conservation surgery; lateral chest wall perforator flap; partial breast reconstruction.
© 2021 Roy et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Staged approach to partial breast reconstruction to avoid mastectomy in women with breast cancer.Gland Surg. 2017 Aug;6(4):336-342. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.03.08. Gland Surg. 2017. PMID: 28861373 Free PMC article.
-
Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment.World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03638-5. World J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39849532 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of partial breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator artery flaps: Clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1883-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.249. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33895022
-
Chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction after breast conservation surgery: an additional oncoplastic surgical option.Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Jul 17;14:1073. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1073. eCollection 2020. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020. PMID: 32863867 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of oncoplastic volume replacement breast surgery: oncological safety and cosmetic outcome.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Jan;104(1):5-17. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0012. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022. PMID: 34767472 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Dual-Layer Rotation: A Versatile Therapeutic Mammoplasty Technique.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6716-6727. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35711016 Free PMC article.
-
Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Breast Conservation: Versatile, Affordable, and Scalable: Insights from the Largest Single-Surgeon Audit from India.Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 14;32(3):165. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030165. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40136369 Free PMC article.
-
Chest wall perforator flap partial breast reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of surgical, cosmetic and survival outcome.Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Mar 14;18:1681. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1681. eCollection 2024. Ecancermedicalscience. 2024. PMID: 38566767 Free PMC article.
-
[Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy].Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2023 Aug;55(4):253-261. doi: 10.1055/a-2082-1542. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2023. PMID: 37487507 Free PMC article. German.
-
Molecular heterogeneity and MYC dysregulation in triple-negative breast cancer: genomic advances and therapeutic implications.3 Biotech. 2025 Jan;15(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04195-0. Epub 2025 Jan 5. 3 Biotech. 2025. PMID: 39777154 Review.
References
-
- Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi PL, Raposio E. Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(11):2572–2585. - PubMed
-
- Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen international expert consensus conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1700–1712. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx308 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous