Bases of Forensic Pathology Expert Testimony With Emphasis on Iowa v Tyler
- PMID: 35003450
- PMCID: PMC8727841
- DOI: 10.1177/19253621211060961
Bases of Forensic Pathology Expert Testimony With Emphasis on Iowa v Tyler
Abstract
Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. Iowa v Tyler provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. Tyler has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.
Keywords: Expert opinion; Expert witness; Forensic pathologist; Forensic pathology; Iowa v Tyler; Testimony.
© 2021 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures & Declaration of Conflicts of Interest: The author, reviewers, editors, and publication staff do not report any relevant conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Garrett BL, Neufeld PJ. Forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions. Virginia L Rev. 2009;95(1):1–97.
-
- Sanders J. Expert witness ethics. Fordham L Rev. 2007;76(3):1539–1584.
-
- Houck MM, Funk C, Feder HA. Successful Expert Testimony. CRC Press; 2018: 256.
-
- Lubet S, Boals EI. Expert Testimony. 4th ed. National Institute for Trial Advocacy/Wolters Kluwer Law; 2020: 208.
-
- Babitsky SB, Mangraviti JJ. How to Become a Dangerous Expert Witness: Advanced Techniques and Strategies. SEAK, Inc.; 2005: 436.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources