Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;10(4):488-499.
doi: 10.1037/ppm0000342. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Selfie Appearance Investment and Peer Feedback Concern: Multi-Method Investigation of Adolescent Selfie Practices and Adjustment

Affiliations

Selfie Appearance Investment and Peer Feedback Concern: Multi-Method Investigation of Adolescent Selfie Practices and Adjustment

Jacqueline Nesi et al. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Sharing "selfies" on social media is common among adolescents. The frequency with which adolescents post selfies may be less important than behaviors and cognitions underlying selfie-posting, and these practices may differ by gender. This multi-method study explored selfie practices in a school-based sample of 639 adolescents (M age=17.6; 53.5% female). Participants completed self-report measures of selfie practices, body esteem, depressive symptoms, and peer behaviors. In addition, a subset of participants' social media pages (n = 245) were observationally-coded for numbers of selfies, followers, and likes. Factor analyses revealed two distinct selfie practices: selfie appearance investment and selfie peer feedback concern. Girls posted selfies more frequently, and reported greater levels of appearance investment and concern over peer feedback on selfies compared to boys. Multiple group structural equation models indicated that for boys and girls, selfie appearance investment was associated with depressive symptoms. For girls only, selfie peer feedback concern was associated with excessive reassurance-seeking and lower body esteem. No associations were revealed between observationally-coded measures of selfie-posting frequency and psychosocial outcomes. Overall, findings suggest that frequency of selfie-posting may be less relevant for understanding adolescent adjustment than investment in and concern over the selfie-posting experience.

Keywords: adolescents; appearance investment; gender differences; selfie; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Multiple-group structural equation model by gender of selfie practices (Selfie Appearance Investment and Peer Feedback Concern) predicting psychosocial outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker JH, Neyland MKH, Thornton LM, Runfola CD, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, & Bulik C. (2019). Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 55(7), 1566–1578. 10.1037/dev0000724 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. boyd D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, 1–18. 10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.119 - DOI
    1. Brown TA, Cash TF, & Mikulka PJ (1990). Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment. 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burnette CB, Kwitowski MA, & Mazzeo SE (2017). “I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media:” A qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image, 23, 114–125. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butkowski CP, Dixon TL, & Weeks K. (2019). Body surveillance on Instagram: Examining the role of selfie feedback investment in young adult women’s body image concerns. Sex Roles, 81(5–6), 385–397. 10.1007/s11199-018-0993-6 - DOI