Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 24:8:765562.
doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.765562. eCollection 2021.

Recent Developments in Data-Assisted Modeling of Flexible Proteins

Affiliations
Review

Recent Developments in Data-Assisted Modeling of Flexible Proteins

Cezary Czaplewski et al. Front Mol Biosci. .

Abstract

Many proteins can fold into well-defined conformations. However, intrinsically-disordered proteins (IDPs) do not possess a defined structure. Moreover, folded multi-domain proteins often digress into alternative conformations. Collectively, the conformational dynamics enables these proteins to fulfill specific functions. Thus, most experimental observables are averaged over the conformations that constitute an ensemble. In this article, we review the recent developments in the concept and methods for the determination of the dynamic structures of flexible peptides and proteins. In particular, we describe ways to extract information from nuclear magnetic resonance small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectroscopy (XL-MS) measurements. All these techniques can be used to obtain ensemble-averaged restraints or to re-weight the simulated conformational ensembles.

Keywords: chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectroscopy; coarse graining; conformational ensembles; data-assisted modeling; molecular dynamics; nuclear magnetic resonance; proteins; small-angle X-ray scattering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A scheme of methods for the determination of conformational ensembles of flexible proteins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham M. J., Murtola T., Schulz R., Páll S., Smith J. C., Hess B., et al. (2015). GROMACS: High Performance Molecular Simulations through Multi-Level Parallelism from Laptops to Supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19–25. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 - DOI
    1. Amirkulova D. B., White A. D. (2019). Recent Advances in Maximum Entropy Biasing Techniques for Molecular Dynamics. Mol. Simul. 45, 1285–1294. 10.1080/08927022.2019.1608988 - DOI
    1. Antonov L. D., Olsson S., Boomsma W., Hamelryck T. (2016). Bayesian Inference of Protein Ensembles from SAXS Data. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 5832–5838. 10.1039/c5cp04886a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baek M., DiMaio F., Anishchenko I., Dauparas J., Ovchinnikov S., Lee G. R., et al. (2021). Accurate Prediction of Protein Structures and Interactions Using a Three-Track Neural Network. Science 373, 871–876. 10.1126/science.abj8754 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belsom A., Rappsilber J. (2021). Anatomy of a Crosslinker. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 60, 39–46. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.07.008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources