Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions
- PMID: 35004905
- PMCID: PMC8733203
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.795195
Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms and improves outcomes. However, patients undergoing CABG surgery typically have advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease and remain at high risk for symptom recurrence and adverse events. Functional non-invasive testing for ischaemia is commonly used as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary and graft angiography, and for guiding subsequent revascularisation decisions. However, performing and interpreting non-invasive ischaemia testing in patients post CABG is challenging, irrespective of the imaging modality used. Multiple factors including advanced multi-vessel native vessel disease, variability in coronary hemodynamics post-surgery, differences in graft lengths and vasomotor properties, and complex myocardial scar morphology are only some of the pathophysiological mechanisms that complicate ischaemia evaluation in this patient population. Systematic assessment of the impact of these challenges in relation to each imaging modality may help optimize diagnostic test selection by incorporating clinical information and individual patient characteristics. At the same time, recent technological advances in cardiac imaging including improvements in image quality, wider availability of quantitative techniques for measuring myocardial blood flow and the introduction of artificial intelligence-based approaches for image analysis offer the opportunity to re-evaluate the value of ischaemia testing, providing new insights into the pathophysiological processes that determine outcomes in this patient population.
Keywords: CABG; ischaemia detection; myocardial perfusion; stress imaging; surgical revascularisation.
Copyright © 2021 Seraphim, Knott, Augusto, Menacho, Tyebally, Dowsing, Bhattacharyya, Menezes, Jones, Uppal, Moon and Manisty.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Trends in operating room procedures in U.S. Hospitals, 2001–2011: statistical brief #171. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville: MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) (2006). Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201926/ (accessed May 17, 2021).
-
- Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al. . Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet Lond Engl. (1994) 344:563–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91963-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1996) 28:616–26. 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
