Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;7(4):440-449.
doi: 10.1007/s40883-020-00171-1. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

The Role of Nanomaterials and Biological Agents on Rotator Cuff Regeneration

Affiliations

The Role of Nanomaterials and Biological Agents on Rotator Cuff Regeneration

Kenyatta S Washington et al. Regen Eng Transl Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The rotator cuff is a musculotendon unit responsible for movement in the shoulder. Rotator cuff tears represent a significant number of musculoskeletal injuries in the adult population. In addition, there is a high incidence of retear rates due to various complications within the complex anatomical structure and the lack of proper healing. Current clinical strategies for rotator cuff augmentation include surgical intervention with autograft tissue grafts and beneficial impacts have been shown, but challenges still exist because of limited supply. For decades, nanomaterials have been engineered for the repair of various tissue and organ systems. This review article provides a thorough summary of the role nanomaterials, stem cells and biological agents have played in rotator cuff repair to date and offers input on next generation approaches for regenerating this tissue.

Keywords: Rotator cuff regeneration; drug delivery vehicles; fatty infiltration; nanofibers; nanofibrous scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Rotator cuff anatomy and the involved tendons including Supraspinatus, Infraspinatus, Teres Minor and Subscapularis [3].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Rotator cuff fatty infiltration in Sub-acute and Chronic injury.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
a) Masson trichrome staining of rotator cuff for different groups 12 weeks after surgery, I) Native tendon, II) Repaired group, III) Repaired group with matrix implantation without cell, IV) Repaired group with cell-seeded matrix implantation [56] (Reprinted from an open access article under terms Creative Commons Attribution License); b) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of rotator cuff for different groups 16 weeks after surgery, A) Uninjured group, B) Massive rotator cuff tear group 32 weeks after injury, C) Repaired group with matrix alone, and D) Repaired group with secretome-seeded matrix [59].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Urwin M et al., “Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: The comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation,” Ann. Rheum. Dis, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 649–655, 1998, doi: 10.1136/ard.57.11.649. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishay V and Gallo RA, “The Evaluation and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Pathology,” Prim. Care Clin. Off. Pract, vol. 40, pp. 889–910, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saveh-Shemshaki N, Nair LS, and Laurencin CT, “Nanofiber-based matrices for rotator cuff regenerative engineering,” Acta Biomater, vol. 94, pp. 64–81, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moffat KL, Kwei ASP, Spalazzi JP, Doty SB, Levine WN, and Lu HH, “Novel nanofiber-based scaffold for rotator cuff repair and augmentation,” Tissue Eng. - Part A, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–126, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer DC, Pirkl C, Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M, and Gerber C, “Asymmetric atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle following tendon tear,” J. Orthop. Res, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 254–258, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.06.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources