Antimicrobial prophylaxis post-amniocentesis procedures in cattle: A randomized controlled equivalence study
- PMID: 35005294
- PMCID: PMC8717245
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2021.100225
Antimicrobial prophylaxis post-amniocentesis procedures in cattle: A randomized controlled equivalence study
Abstract
Amniocentesis is a routine procedure utilized on several species including human, equine, and bovine patients. Early assessment and discovery of new genetic traits in the cattle industry are highly desirable in order to accelerate genetic gain by shortening generational intervals. One of the main concerns from this procedure is the introduction of pathogenic bacterial contamination into the amniotic cavity thereby increasing the risks of spontaneous pregnancy losses post procedure. In this randomized controlled equivalence study, we have tested the effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis on the incidence of spontaneous abortions and contrasted it to untreated individuals post amniocentesis. On the treated group (n = 67) all heifers remained pregnant whereas 1 of the untreated group (n = 65) resulted in a spontaneous abortion during the study period. The latter represents 1.54% of pregnancy losses attributed to the risk associated to the amniocentesis procedure. However, the probability of inducing spontaneous abortion from the technique itself is not different to that of the contemporaneous population (n = 694) not undergoing amniocentesis viz., 1.59%. Following a two-tailed distribution, statistical analyses showed no significant differences across treatments (Fisher's exact test P = 0.49). The current prospective study indicates that performing amniocenteses on cattle have resulted in similar spontaneous pregnancy losses comparable to those of pregnant heifers without undergoing amniocentesis and regardless of antimicrobial use. In conclusion, prophylactic antimicrobials may not be applicable within the cattle amniocentesis framework.
Keywords: Amniocentesis; Antimicrobial prophylaxis; Bovine.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors in this study declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Mid-trimester amniocentesis and antibiotic prophylaxis.Prenat Diagn. 2007 Oct;27(10):956-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.1809. Prenat Diagn. 2007. PMID: 17607664
-
Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.078. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15343248 Review.
-
The effect of diagnostic amniocentesis and its complications on early spontaneous abortion.Electron Physician. 2016 Aug 25;8(8):2787-2792. doi: 10.19082/2787. eCollection 2016 Aug. Electron Physician. 2016. PMID: 27757190 Free PMC article.
-
Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.Ultraschall Med. 2008 Apr;29(2):165-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963217. Epub 2007 Jun 29. Ultraschall Med. 2008. PMID: 17602371
-
Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Jun;28(6):512-8. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32171-5. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006. PMID: 16857119
References
-
- Bongso T.A., Basrur P.K. Prenatal diagnosis of sex in cattle by amniocentesis. The Veterinary Record. 1975;96:124–126. - PubMed
-
- Daum H., Ben David A., Nadjari M., Zenvirt S., Helman S., Yanai N., et al. Role of late amniocentesis in the era of modern genomic technologies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;53:676–685. - PubMed
-
- Fuchs F., Riis P. Antenatal sex determination. Nature. 1956;177:330. - PubMed
-
- Garcia A., Salaheddine M. Bovine ultrasound-guided transvaginal amniocentesis. Theriogenology. 1997;47:1003–1008. - PubMed
-
- Giorlandino C., Cignini P., Cini M., Brizzi C., Carcioppolo O., Milite V., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis before second-trimester genetic amniocentesis (APGA): A single-centre open randomised controlled trial. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2009;29:606–612. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources