Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):15-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.019. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality

Affiliations
Review

Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality

Xueqing Yu et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

The prevalence of kidney failure continues to rise globally. Dialysis is a treatment option for individuals with kidney failure; after the decision to initiate dialysis has been made, it is critical to involve individuals in the decision on which dialysis modality to choose. This review, based on evidence arising from the literature, examines the role of shared decision-making (SDM) in helping those with kidney failure to select a dialysis modality. SDM was found to lead to more people with kidney failure feeling satisfied with their choice of dialysis modality. Individuals with kidney failure must be cognizant that SDM is an active and iterative process, and their participation is essential for success in empowering them to make decisions on dialysis modality. The educational components of SDM must be easy to understand, high quality, unbiased, up to date, and targeted to the linguistic, educational, and cultural needs of the individual. All individuals with kidney failure should be encouraged to participate in SDM and should be involved in the design and implementation of SDM approaches.

Keywords: continuous renal replacement therapy; education; hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 3-talk shared decision-making model. Adapted from Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–1367. © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published as open access at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11606-012-2077-6. PDA, patient decision aid.

References

    1. Levey A.S., Eckardt K.-U., Tsukamoto Y., et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Kidney Int. 2005;67:2089–2100. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.xv. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liyanage T., Ninomiya T., Jha V., et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385:1975–1982. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61601-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. 2020 USRDS annual data report United States Renal Data System, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. https://adr.usrds.org/2020 Accessed August 2021.
    1. White S.L., Chadban S.J., Jan S., et al. How can we achieve global equity in provision of renal replacement therapy? Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:161–240. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.041715. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources