Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 15;66(3):e0216121.
doi: 10.1128/aac.02161-21. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Taniborbactam against Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Recovered in Spain

Affiliations

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Taniborbactam against Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Recovered in Spain

Marta Hernández-García et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations currently approved for clinical use are poorly active against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing strains. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-taniborbactam (FTB [formerly cefepime-VNRX-5133]) and comparator agents against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (n = 247) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas species (n = 170) clinical isolates prospectively collected from different clinical origins in patients admitted to 8 Spanish hospitals. FTB was the most active agent in both Enterobacterales (97.6% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L) and Pseudomonas (67.1% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L) populations. The MICFTB was >8 mg/L in 6/247 (2.4%) Enterobacterales isolates (3 KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 1 VIM-producing Enterobacter cloacae isolate, 1 IMP-producing E. cloacae isolate, and 1 NDM-producing Escherichia coli isolate) and in 56/170 (32.9%) Pseudomonas isolates, 19 of them carbapenemase producers (15 producers of VIM, 2 of GES, 1 of GES+VIM, and 1 of GES+KPC). Against the Enterobacterales isolates with meropenem MICs of >2 mg/L (138/247), FTB was the most active agent against both serine-β-lactamases (107/138) and MBL producers (31/138) (97.2 and 93.5% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L, respectively), whereas the activity of comparators was reduced, particularly against the MBL producers (ceftazidime-avibactam, 94.4 and 12.9%, meropenem-vaborbactam, 85.0 and 64.5%, imipenem-relebactam, 76.6 and 9.7%, ceftolozane-tazobactam, 1.9 and 0%, and piperacillin-tazobactam, 0 and 0%, respectively). Among the meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas isolates (163/170; MIC, >2 mg/L), the activities of FTB against serine-β-lactamase (35/163) and MBL (43/163) producers were 88.6 and 65.1%, respectively, whereas the susceptibilities of comparators were as follows: ceftazidime-avibactam, 88.5 and 16.0%, meropenem-vaborbactam, 8.5 and 7.0%, imipenem-relebactam, 2.9 and 2.3%, ceftolozane-tazobactam, 0 and 2.3%, and piperacillin-tazobactam, 0 and 0%, respectively. Microbiological results suggest FTB as a potential therapeutic option in patients infected with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas isolates, including MBL producers.

Keywords: carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa; cefepime-taniborbactam susceptibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare a conflict of interest. R.C. has participated in educational programs organized by MSD and Pfizer and has received research support from MSD and Venatorx Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Distribution of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas isolates by cefepime-taniborbactam MIC values and carbapenemase (CP) enzymes detected. MDR, multidrug resistance; XDR, extremely drug resistant. The dotted line represents the provisional cefepime-taniborbactam breakpoint used for comparative purposes only (S, ≤8/4 mg/L; R, >8/4 mg/L).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bush K, Bradford PA. 2016. β-Lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors: an overview. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 6:a025247. 10.1101/cshperspect.a025247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bush K, Jacoby GA. 2010. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:969–976. 10.1128/AAC.01009-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh TR. 2010. Emerging carbapenemases: a global perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36:S8–S14. 10.1016/S0924-8579(10)70004-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cantón R, Akóva M, Carmeli Y, Giske CG, Glupczynski Y, Gniadkowski M, Livermore DM, Miriagou V, Naas T, Rossolini GM, Samuelsen Seifert H, Woodford N, Nordmann P, Poirel L, Bogaerts P, Navon-Venezia S, Cornaglia G, European Network on Carbapenemases. 2012. Rapid evolution and spread of carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:413–431. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03821.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yahav D, Giske CG, Gramatniece A, Abodakpi H, Tam VH, Leibovici L. 2021. New β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin Microbiol Rev 34:e00115-20. 10.1128/CMR.00115-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types