Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 25;11(1):60.
doi: 10.3390/plants11010060.

Effect of LED Lighting on Physical Environment and Microenvironment on In Vitro Plant Growth and Morphogenesis: The Need to Standardize Lighting Conditions and Their Description

Affiliations
Review

Effect of LED Lighting on Physical Environment and Microenvironment on In Vitro Plant Growth and Morphogenesis: The Need to Standardize Lighting Conditions and Their Description

Araceli Barceló-Muñoz et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

In the last decades, lighting installations in plant tissue culture have generally been renewed or designed based on LED technology. Thanks to this, many different light quality advances are available but, with their massive implementation, the same issue is occurring as in the 1960s with the appearance of the Grolux (Sylvania) fluorescent tubes: there is a lack of a methodological standardization of lighting. This review analyzes the main parameters and variables that must be taken into account in the design of LED-based systems, and how these need to be described and quantified in order to homogenize and standardize the experimental conditions to obtain reproducible and comparable results and conclusions. We have designed an experimental system in which the values of the physical environment and microenvironment conditions and the behavior of plant tissue cultures maintained in cabins illuminated with two lighting designs can be compared. Grolux tubes are compared with a combination of monochromatic LED lamps calibrated to provide a spectral emission, and light irradiance values similar to those generated by the previous discharge lamps, achieving in both cases wide uniformity of radiation conditions on the shelves of the culture cabins. This study can help to understand whether it is possible to use LEDs as one standard lighting source in plant tissue culture without affecting the development of the cultures maintained with the previously regulated protocols in the different laboratories. Finally, the results presented from this caparison indicate how temperature is one of the main factors that is affected by the chosen light source.

Keywords: Grolux fluorescent lamps; in vitro culture; in vitro environmental conditions; light spectral characterization; light-emitting diodes (LEDs); plant tissue culture; temperature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spectral diagram and values of light characterization of the emission of a Grolux fluorescent tube.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Common photometric diagrams found in led lamps for in vitro culture. (A) Fluorescent tube lamp (B) 120° hemispheric distribution (regular pattern of most HP LEDs without external lenses) (C) 60° concentrated distribution (regular pattern of many HB LED without external lenses). (D) Homogenized 120° distribution. Optimal lens design for chambers (i.e., PMMA C17720 EMERALD lens by Ledil).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the light spectra of (a) Grolux fluorescent and (b) R + G + B LED equivalence.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Test cabins with (a) Grolux fluorescent lamps and (b) LED Grolux spectrum equivalence.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of the light spectra on in vitro proliferation of (a) strawberry and (b) rose with Grolux fluorescent (blue line) and R + G + B LED equivalence (red line).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Thermographic images of the temperature outside the vessels under (a) Grolux fluorescent lighting and (b) LED lighting. (Thermographic camera model 875. Manufacturer Testo).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Thermographic images of the temperature in the vessels under (a) Grolux fluorescent lighting and (b) LED lighting. (Thermographic camera model 875. Manufacturer Testo).

References

    1. Lecler M.T., Zimmermann F., Silvente E., Masson A., Morèle Y., Remy A., Chollot A. Improving the work environment in the fluorescent lamp recycling sector by optimizing mercury elimination. Waste Manag. 2018;76:250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson G. The Museum Environment. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science; Burlington, VT, USA: 2013. - DOI
    1. Ahmed S., Amir F., Riaz-ul-Hasnain S., Shahwar D., Jamil S. Electronic ballast circuit configurations for fluorescent lamps; Proceedings of the 2015 Power Generation System and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET); Islamabad, Pakistan. 10–11 June 2015; pp. 1–8. - DOI
    1. Hammer E.E. Effects of ambient temperature on the performance of bent tube fluorescent lamps. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1989;25:216–223. doi: 10.1109/28.25534. - DOI
    1. Helson V.A. Comparison of Gro-Lux and cool-white fluorescent lamps with and without incandescent as light sources used in plant growth rooms for growth and development of tomato plants. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1965;45:461–466. doi: 10.4141/cjps65-089. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources