Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):53.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09155-y.

Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review

Anna Gillman  1 , Michelle Hayes  2 , Greg Sheaf  3 , Margaret Walshe  1 , John V Reynolds  4 , Julie Regan  5
Affiliations

Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review

Anna Gillman et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is prevalent in oesophageal cancer with significant clinical and psychosocial complications. The purpose of this study was i) to examine the impact of exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation on clinical and quality of life outcomes in this population and ii) to identify key rehabilitation components that may inform future research in this area.

Methods: Randomised control trials (RCT), non-RCTs, cohort studies and case series were included. 10 databases (CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OpenGrey, PROSPERO, RIAN and SpeechBITE), 3 clinical trial registries, and relevant conference abstracts were searched in November 2020. Two independent authors assessed articles for eligibility before completing data extraction, quality assessment using ROBINS-I and Downs and Black Checklist, followed by descriptive data analysis. The primary outcomes included oral intake, respiratory status and quality of life. All comparable outcomes were combined and discussed throughout the manuscript as primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: Three single centre non-randomised control studies involving 311 participants were included. A meta-analysis could not be completed due to study heterogeneity. SLT-led post-operative dysphagia intervention led to significantly earlier start to oral intake and reduced length of post-operative hospital stay. No studies found a reduction in aspiration pneumonia rates, and no studies included patient reported or quality of life outcomes. Of the reported secondary outcomes, swallow prehabilitation resulted in significantly improved swallow efficiency following oesophageal surgery compared to the control group, and rehabilitation following surgery resulted in significantly reduced vallecular and pyriform sinus residue. The three studies were found to have 'serious' to 'critical' risk of bias.

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights a low-volume of low-quality evidence to support exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation in adults undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer. As dysphagia is a common symptom impacting quality of life throughout survivorship, findings will guide future research to determine if swallowing rehabilitation should be included in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes. This review is limited by the inclusion of non-randomised control trials and the reliance on Japanese interpretation which may have resulted in bias. The reviewed studies were all of weak design with limited data reported.

Keywords: Curative treatment; Dysphagia - swallowing rehabilitation; Oesophageal cancer; Swallow exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnold M, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(11):1493–505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan E, et al. International trends in oesophageal cancer survival by histological subtype between 1995 and 2014. Gut. 2021;70(2):234–242. - PubMed
    1. McCann P, et al. The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37(1):11–62. - PubMed
    1. Donlon NE, et al. Modern oncological and operative outcomes in esophageal cancer: the St. James's hospital experience. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190(1):297–305. - PubMed
    1. Schandl A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(6):613–619. - PubMed

Publication types