Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 10;13(1):153.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27649-y.

Dynamics of spike-and nucleocapsid specific immunity during long-term follow-up and vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 convalescents

Affiliations

Dynamics of spike-and nucleocapsid specific immunity during long-term follow-up and vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 convalescents

Nina Koerber et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Anti-viral immunity continuously declines over time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we characterize the dynamics of anti-viral immunity during long-term follow-up and after BNT162b2 mRNA-vaccination in convalescents after asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Virus-specific and virus-neutralizing antibody titers rapidly declined in convalescents over 9 months after infection, whereas virus-specific cytokine-producing polyfunctional T cells persisted, among which IL-2-producing T cells correlated with virus-neutralizing antibody titers. Among convalescents, 5% of individuals failed to mount long-lasting immunity after infection and showed a delayed response to vaccination compared to 1% of naïve vaccinees, but successfully responded to prime/boost vaccination. During the follow-up period, 8% of convalescents showed a selective increase in virus-neutralizing antibody titers without accompanying increased frequencies of circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. The same convalescents, however, responded to vaccination with simultaneous increase in antibody and T cell immunity revealing the strength of mRNA-vaccination to increase virus-specific immunity in convalescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and virus-neutralization activity after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection.
a Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (nucleocapsid-specific) IgG levels determined by CLIA from 4554 health care workers (blue—seronegative individuals, n = 4446; red—seropositive individuals, n = 108) at month 2 after infection. Data are shown as median (55.93 and 0.40) with box bounds at 25% (33.02 and 0.26) and 75% percentile (83.04 and 0.69), whiskers show maxima (113.8 and 0.06) and minima (10.01 and 4.90). b Paired analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid-specific IgG titers (n = 91). c Change (Δ) in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers at month 5 (y-axis) compared to initial anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers at month 2 (x-axis); LLOD—lower limit of detection. d Paired analysis of virus-neutralization activity (n = 86) measured as 50% inhibition of viral infection in cell culture (dilution 1:x). Nine convalescents had no detectable and 12 had only low virus-neutralization activity. LLOQ lower limit of quantification, ULOQ upper limit of quantification. e Change (Δ) in cell culture virus-neutralization activity (as log2) at month 5 (y-axis) compared to virus-neutralization activity at month 2 (x-axis), results from 21 individuals were below the quantification limit and are not shown but included in the statistical analysis. f Reporting of symptoms (n = 68) or no symptoms (n = 18) in convalescents and virus-neutralization activity. Data are shown as median (138.70 and 49.45) with box bounds at 25% (33.40 and 1.00) and 75% percentile (634.70 and 201.30), whiskers show maxima (2560 and 604.40) and minima (1.00 for both). Statistical analyses by two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test (b, d), two-sided Mann–Whitney test (f), Spearman correlation and linear regression (c, e); rs denotes Spearman correlation coefficient; *p < 0.05; ****p < 0.0001.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. IL-2 dominated spike-specific CD4 T cell responses in convalescents.
a, b Ex vivo Fluorospot analysis revealing the frequencies of spike-reactive mono- and polyfunctional cytokine-secreting cells (spot-forming cells/SFCs per 106 PBMCs from convalescents (red) or naïve individuals (blue) at month 5. c, d Total frequencies of spike-reactive cytokine-expressing cells (shown as median ± SD), CEF (CMV/EBV/Flu) peptide pool as a control in convalescents (red, n = 88) or naïve individuals (blue, n = 52). e Ex vivo detection of the frequencies of CD4 and CD8 T cells of convalescents (n = 9) by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. f Correlation of the frequencies of nucleocapsid- (NCAP) and S1- and S2-reactive T cells determined by Fluorospot analysis in convalescents at month 5. Statistical analyses by two-sided Mann–Whitney, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman correlation and linear regression (c, e, f); rs denotes Spearman correlation coefficient; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Frequencies of IL-2 and IFNγ-secreting but not IL-4 secreting cells correlate with virus-neutralization activity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescents.
a Frequencies of spike-reactive IL-4- or IL-5-secreting cells in convalescents (red, n = 23) or naïve individuals (blue, n = 6). b, c Correlation of frequencies of S1- or S2-reactive IFNγ-, IL-2-, TNF-, or IL-4-secreting cells with virus-neutralization activity or anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in convalescents. Statistical analyses by two-sided Mann–Whitney test (a), Spearman correlation and linear regression (b, c); rs denotes Spearman correlation coefficient; n.s. denotes not significant; ****p < 0.0001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Persistence of polyfunctional S1- and S2-reactive IFNγ- and IL-2-secreting cells up to 11 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
(a, b) frequencies of spike-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents (n = 32) at month 5 and month 11 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. c Frequencies of CEF-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents (n = 32) at month 5 and month 11 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. d Heatmap revealing frequencies of convalescents bearing S1-reactive mono- or polyfunctional cytokine-secreting cells at month 5 and month 11 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. e Fluorospot analysis revealing the frequencies of spike-reactive mono- and polyfunctional cytokine-secreting cells (SFCs per 106 PBMCs) from convalescents (n = 49) at month 11 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Statistical analyses by two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (ac, e); n.s. denotes not significant; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Rapid induction of polyfunctional IL-2-secreting T cells in convalescents and naïve individuals after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination.
(a) frequencies of spike-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents (red, n = 50 (m11), n = 54 (vacc), n = 23 (boost)), and naïve individuals (blue, n = 39 (m11), n = 49 (vacc), n = 40 (boost)) at month 11 after SARS-CoV-2 infection, two weeks after BNT162b2 mRNA prime vaccination (vacc) and 2 weeks after boost vaccination (boost). b Heatmap revealing frequencies of individuals bearing S1-reactive mono- or polyfunctional cytokine-secreting cells; convalescents (c), naïve individuals (n). c Median and standard deviation for S1-reactive cytokine-secreting cells. d, e S1-reactive IL-2 and IFNγ-producing CD4 and CD8 T cells in convalescents (red, n = 19) and naïve individuals (blue, n = 31) determined directly ex vivo by flow cytometry using intracellular cytokine staining. Statistical analyses by ANOVA, two-sided Mann–Whitney and two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (a, e). n.s. denotes not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Low responder convalescents respond to prime/boost BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination.
(a) surrogate virus-neutralization after prime and boost vaccination in convalescents (red, n = 77 (vacc), n = 28 (boost)), low responder convalescents (gray, n = 5) and naïve individuals (blue, n = 51 (vacc), n = 49 (boost)). Data are shown as median (vacc: 2099 and 19, boost: 2022 and 1605) with box bounds at 25% (vacc: 1813 and 12, boost: 1742 and 1068) and 75% percentile (vacc: 2424 and 46, boost: 2414 and 2005), whiskers show maxima (vacc: 3000 and 531, boost: 2963 and 3000) and minima (vacc: 8 and 4, boost: 980 and 53). b Surrogate virus-neutralization of low responder convalescents (light gray, n = 5) and after prime and boost BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination compared to a cohort of 455 naïve individuals (blue) including low responders to vaccination (dark gray, n = 4). Data are shown as median (vacc: 13 and 33, boost: 1709 and 1723) with box bounds at 25% (vacc: 8 and 18, boost: 1126 and 1376) and 75% percentile (vacc: 47 and 68, boost: 1785 and 1981), whiskers show maxima (vacc: 48 and 764, boost: 1795 and 3000) and minima (vacc: 8 and 1, boost: 980 and 3). c Cell culture virus-neutralization activity at month 2 after SARS-CoV-2 infection in serum of convalescents (n = 81) compared to those with low response to vaccination (n = 5). Data is shown as median (136.4) with box bounds at 25% (34.2) and 75% percentile (479.5), whiskers show maximum (2560) and minimum (1.0). dg Frequencies of spike-reactive, nucleocapsid-reactive or CEF-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents (red, n = 83 (d, e, g) and n = 16 (f)) and low responder convalescents (gray, n = 5) at month 5 after infection. h Frequencies of spike-reactive cytokine-secreting cells at month 11 after infection, 2 weeks after prime (vacc) and 2 weeks after boost (boost) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination; convalescents (red, n = 45 (m11), n = 49 (vacc), n = 19 (boost)), low responder convalescents (gray, n = 5 at all time points) and naïve individuals (blue, n = 39 (m11), n = 49 (vacc), n = 40 (boost)). Statistical analyses by ANOVA, two-sided Mann–Whitney and two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (a, b, dh). n.s. denotes not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Disparate increase in virus-neutralization activity but not spike-reactive T cells in convalescents during long-term follow-up compared to infection and vaccination.
a Change (Δ) in cell culture virus-neutralization activity and surrogate virus-neutralization activity in convalescents (red, n = 78), and convalescents with more than 3 log2 change in cell culture neutralization activity (yellow, n = 6) (detected in samples obtained at months 5, 8, and 11) or in a recently SARS-CoV-2 infected naïve individual (1/53) (turquoise, n = 1). b Virus-neutralization activities at two-time points in convalescents identified in (a); a—denotes values at month 5 or 8, and b—denotes values at month 11 after initial infection. c Change (Δ) in nucleocapsid-specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in individuals from (a) and naïve individuals (blue, n = 52). d Frequencies of S1/S2-reactive mono- and polyfunctional cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents from (a, yellow) at month 5 (left panel) and at month 11 (right panel) as well as convalescents without a surge in virus-neutralization activity (red). e Total frequencies of S1-reactive IFNγ- and IL-2-secreting cells from (d). e, f Frequencies of spike-reactive or nucleocapsid-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in convalescents (red, n = 32 (month 5), n = 30 (month 11)) or convalescents with increased virus-neutralization activity (yellow, n = 6). g, h frequencies of spike- and nucleocapsid-reactive cytokine-secreting cells in a recently infected naive individual from (a, turquoise) and convalescents (red), at months 5 and 11 (after infection of the single individual). i, j Frequencies of S1-reactive IFNγ- and IL-2-secreting cells before vaccination (month 11), 2 weeks after vaccination (vacc) and 2 weeks after boost vaccination (boost) in convalescents (red, n = 44 (month 11), n = 48 (vacc), n = 20 (boost)) and convalescents with increased virus-neutralization activity (yellow, n = 6 at all time points), and in naïve individuals (blue, n = 39 (month 11), n = 49 (vacc), n = 40 (boost)), and an infected individual (turquoise, n = 1). Statistical analyses by ANOVA, two-sided Mann–Whitney and two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (e, f, i). n.s. denotes not significant; *p < 0.05.

References

    1. Zhu N, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou P, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020;26:450–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi RT, Lynch JB, Del Rio C. Mild or moderate Covid-19. The. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1757–1766. - PubMed
    1. Berlin DA, Gulick RM, Martinez FJ. Severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2451–2460. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms