Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;126(3):472-481.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01593-6. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Development and validation of a circulating microRNA panel for the early detection of breast cancer

Affiliations

Development and validation of a circulating microRNA panel for the early detection of breast cancer

Ruiyang Zou et al. Br J Cancer. 2022 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Mammography is widely used for breast cancer screening but suffers from a high false-positive rate. Here, we perform the largest comprehensive, multi-center study to date involving diverse ethnic groups, for the identification of circulating miRNAs for breast cancer screening.

Methods: This study had a discovery phase (n = 289) and two validation phases (n = 374 and n = 379). Quantitative PCR profiling of 324 miRNAs was performed on serum samples from breast cancer (all stages) and healthy subjects to identify miRNA biomarkers. Two-fold cross-validation was used for building and optimising breast cancer-associated miRNA panels. An optimal panel was validated in cohorts with Caucasian and Asian samples. Diagnostic ability was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: The study identified and validated 30 miRNAs dysregulated in breast cancer. An optimised eight-miRNA panel showed consistent performance in all cohorts and was successfully validated with AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.915, 82.3%, 72.2% and 91.5%, respectively. The prediction model detected breast cancer in both Caucasian and Asian populations with AUCs ranging from 0.880 to 0.973, including pre-malignant lesions (stage 0; AUC of 0.831) and early-stage (stages I-II) cancers (AUC of 0.916).

Conclusions: Our panel can potentially be used for breast cancer screening, in conjunction with mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HPT, LZ and RZ are shareholders of MiRXES Pte Ltd. LZ, RZ and YCT are employees of MiRXES Pte Ltd. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Biomarker discovery.
a Volcano plot for 324 miRNAs profiled in 183 breast cancer patients as compared to 106 healthy individuals in the discovery cohort. Eighty-six miRNAs with p-values of less than 0.01 and magnitudes of log2 (fold change) of more than 0.5 are highlighted in red. b Heat-map of 663 cancer and non-cancer samples clustered using the expression of 33 selected miRNA biomarkers identified in the Discovery cohort. The expression levels (copy/ml) of miRNAs are presented in log2 scale and standardised to zero mean. The colour scale represents the concentrations of miRNA. Hierarchical clustering was carried out for both dimensions (miRNAs: Y-axis, samples: X-axis) based on the Euclidean distance. c Correlation of log2 (fold change) for 33 selected miRNA biomarker candidates in the Discovery cohort and Validation 1 cohort. The miRNA biomarker candidates with p-values larger than 0.05 in the validation 1 cohort are highlighted in red.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Optimisation of multi-miRNA biomarker panels.
a Boxplots of AUC of multi-miRNA biomarker panels (with 2–12 miRNAs), in both the training and test sets, calculated from 200 iterations of the two-fold cross-validation process. The boxplot presents the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles in panel AUC. b Median AUC for the training and test sets from 200 iterations of the two-fold cross-validation process for multi-miRNA panels with 2–12 miRNAs. ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). c ROC curves for breast cancer prediction performance of the optimal eight-miRNA biomarker panel in the Discovery and Validation 1 cohorts. The point with the maximum classification accuracy is shown as the red box. The sensitivity and specificity values at the maximum accuracy point are also shown. The 95% CI for these values is shown in the brackets.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Validation of optimal eight-miRNA biomarker panel.
a ROC curve for breast cancer prediction performance of the optimal eight-miRNA biomarker panel in the Validation 2 cohort. The point with the maximum classification accuracy is shown as the red box. The sensitivity and specificity values at the maximum accuracy point are also shown. The 95% CI for these values is shown in the brackets. b AUC of eight-miRNA biomarker panel in detecting breast cancer in the Validation 1 and Validation 2 cohorts separated by sample source. c ROC curves for performance of the optimal eight-miRNA biomarker panel in predicting early (stages 0, I and II) and late (stages III and IV) breast cancer in the Validation 2 cohort.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Prediction algorithm based on the expression of eight-miRNA biomarker panel.
a Prediction algorithm scores of cancer and non-cancer samples calculated from the expression of eight-miRNA panel expression. b Prediction algorithm scores of non-cancer samples and cancer samples by tumour stage (0, I, II, III, IV, and unknown).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Loke SY, Lee ASG. The future of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;92:54–68. - PubMed
    1. Ong MS, Mandl KD. National expenditure for false-positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnoses estimated at $4 billion a year. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34:576–83. - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, O’Meara ES, Kerlikowske K, Balch S, Miglioretti D. Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: An analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:226–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ying L, Du L, Zou R, Shi L, Zhang N, Jin J, et al. Development of a serum miRNA panel for detection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:25036–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. So, JBY, Kapoor, R, Zhu, F, Koh, C, Zhou, L, Zou, R, et al. Development and validation of a serum microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer in a high-risk population. Gut. 2020; 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322065. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types