Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:2:100035.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100035. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

Anticipating hopes, fears and expectations towards COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative interview study in seven European countries

Katharina T Paul  1 , Bettina M Zimmermann  2   3 , Paolo Corsico  4   5 , Amelia Fiske  2 , Susi Geiger  6 , Stephanie Johnson  7 , Janneke M L Kuiper  8 , Elisa Lievevrouw  8 , Luca Marelli  8   9   10 , Barbara Prainsack  1 , Wanda Spahl  1 , Ine Van Hoyweghen  8
Affiliations

Anticipating hopes, fears and expectations towards COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative interview study in seven European countries

Katharina T Paul et al. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Vaccine uptake is essential to managing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern. At the same time, both decision-makers and the general population have high hopes for COVID-19 vaccination. Drawing from qualitative interview data collected in October 2020 as part of the pan-European SolPan study, this study explores early and anticipatory expectations, hopes and fears regarding COVID-19 vaccination across seven European countries. We find that stances towards COVID-19 vaccines were shaped by personal lived experiences, but participants also aligned personal and communal interests in their considerations. Trust, particularly in expert institutions, was an important prerequisite for vaccine acceptance, but participants also expressed doubts about the rapid vaccine development process. Our findings emphasise the need to move beyond the study of factors driving vaccine hesitancy, and instead to focus on how people personally perceive vaccination in their particular social and political context.

Keywords: Europe; Pandemic; Qualitative research; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination policy; Vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of early and anticipatory stances towards COVID-19 vaccines and their underlying motives.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relational and temporal aspects of stances on individual vaccination decisions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ansell B., Bauer M.W., Gingrich J., Stilgoe J. 2021. Coping with Covid: Two-wave survey. Pre-Print on RPubs.https://rpubs.com/benwansell/729135
    1. Baylis F., Kenny N.P., Sherwin S. A relational account of public health ethics. Public Health Ethics. 2008;1(3):196–209. doi: 10.1093/phe/phn025. - DOI
    1. Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. Oxford University Press; 2013.
    1. Becchetti L., Candio P., Salustri F. Vaccine uptake and constrained decision making: The case of Covid-19. Social Science & Medicine. 2021;289 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114410. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell S., Clarke R., Mounier-Jack S., Walker J.L., Paterson P. Parents' and guardians' views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study in England. Vaccine. 2020;38(49):7789–7798. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed