Body mass index affects outcomes after vertebral body tethering surgery
- PMID: 35013996
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00455-8
Body mass index affects outcomes after vertebral body tethering surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) surgery between overweight and non-overweight patients.
Methods: AIS/JIS patients with AVBT with 2-year follow-up from a multi-center pediatric spine database were evaluated pre-operatively, 1st post-operative erect, and 2 years post-operatively. ANOVA was used to compare 3 categories of BMI with significance as per Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc test. Risk of scoliosis progression was analysed with Mid-P exact test.
Results: 121 patients (51 underweight, 58 normal, 12 overweight; mean age 12.5 ± 1.6 yr; BMI 18.8 ± 4.6 kg/m2) were identified. Comparing underweight, normal, and overweight groups: mean pre-operative age (13 yr, 13 yr, 12 yr), scoliosis (52°, 50°, 52°), pre-operative kyphosis (29°, 28°, 33°), peri-operative scoliosis correction (44%, 42%, 46%), and complications by 2-year follow-up (23%, 24%, 17%) were similar between groups. There was one broken tether in each of the underweight and normal weight groups. Change in percent scoliosis correction from 1st erect to 2-year post-operative (i.e., growth modulation phase) was not significantly different between groups; however, the risk ratio for scoliosis progression during this period was 4.74 (1.02-22.02; p = 0.04) for overweight patients.
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that, as compared to normal weight and underweight patients, overweight patients did not have a statistically significant difference in intra-operative scoliosis correction or in risk of experiencing complication; however, overweight patients had a risk ratio of 4.74 for progression of scoliosis during the growth modulation phase of treatment from first erect radiographs to minimum 2-year follow-up.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: BMI; Growth modulation; Obesity; Scoliosis; VBT; Vertebral body tethering.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C (2014) Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am 61:1223–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007 - DOI
-
- Padhye K, Soroceanu A, Russell D et al (2018) Thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation and fusion as a treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review of the literature. Spine Deform 6:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.12.013 - DOI
-
- Hoernschemeyer DG, Boeyer ME, Robertson ME, Loftis CM, Worley JR, Tweedy NM, Gupta SU, Duren DL, Holzhauser CM, Ramachandran VM (2020) Anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent scoliosis with growth remaining: a retrospective review of 2 to 5-year postoperative results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(13):1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00980 - DOI
-
- Newton PO, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP et al (2020) Anterior spinal growth modulation in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg 102:769–777. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.19.01176 - DOI
-
- CDC (2000) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention BMI-for-age charts, United States. https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/clinical_charts.htm . Accessed 8 Mar 2021
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials