Characterizing Patient-Clinician Communication in Secure Medical Messages: Retrospective Study
- PMID: 35014964
- PMCID: PMC8790696
- DOI: 10.2196/17273
Characterizing Patient-Clinician Communication in Secure Medical Messages: Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background: Patient-clinician secure messaging is an important function in patient portals and enables patients and clinicians to communicate on a wide spectrum of issues in a timely manner. With its growing adoption and patient engagement, it is time to comprehensively study the secure messages and user behaviors in order to improve patient-centered care.
Objective: The aim of this paper was to analyze the secure messages sent by patients and clinicians in a large multispecialty health system at Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
Methods: We performed message-based, sender-based, and thread-based analyses of more than 5 million secure messages between 2010 and 2017. We summarized the message volumes, patient and clinician population sizes, message counts per patient or clinician, as well as the trends of message volumes and user counts over the years. In addition, we calculated the time distribution of clinician-sent messages to understand their workloads at different times of a day. We also analyzed the time delay in clinician responses to patient messages to assess their communication efficiency and the back-and-forth rounds to estimate the communication complexity.
Results: During 2010-2017, the patient portal at Mayo Clinic, Rochester experienced a significant growth in terms of the count of patient users and the total number of secure messages sent by patients and clinicians. Three clinician categories, namely "physician-primary care," "registered nurse-specialty," and "physician-specialty," bore the majority of message volume increase. The patient portal also demonstrated growing trends in message counts per patient and clinician. The "nurse practitioner or physician assistant-primary care" and "physician-primary care" categories had the heaviest per-clinician workload each year. Most messages by the clinicians were sent from 7 AM to 5 PM during a day. Yet, between 5 PM and 7 PM, the physicians sent 7.0% (95,785/1,377,006) of their daily messages, and the nurse practitioner or physician assistant sent 5.4% (22,121/408,526) of their daily messages. The clinicians replied to 72.2% (1,272,069/1,761,739) patient messages within 1 day and 90.6% (1,595,702/1,761,739) within 3 days. In 95.1% (1,499,316/1,576,205) of the message threads, the patients communicated with their clinicians back and forth for no more than 4 rounds.
Conclusions: Our study found steady increases in patient adoption of the secure messaging system and the average workload per clinician over 8 years. However, most clinicians responded timely to meet the patients' needs. Our study also revealed differential patient-clinician communication patterns across different practice roles and care settings. These findings suggest opportunities for care teams to optimize messaging tasks and to balance the workload for optimal efficiency.
Keywords: message round; patient portal; patient-clinician communication; response time; secure message; workload.
©Ming Huang, Jungwei Fan, Julie Prigge, Nilay D Shah, Brian A Costello, Lixia Yao. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 11.01.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Provider-to-Patient Secure Messages: How Much Are They Increasing, Who Is Doing the Work, and Is the Work Happening After Hours?JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e16521. doi: 10.2196/16521. JMIR Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32673238 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 6;25:e48583. doi: 10.2196/48583. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37801359 Free PMC article.
-
Growth of Secure Messaging Through a Patient Portal as a Form of Outpatient Interaction across Clinical Specialties.Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Apr 29;6(2):288-304. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0117. eCollection 2015. Appl Clin Inform. 2015. PMID: 26171076 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30973347 Free PMC article.
-
The Next Frontier in Communication and the ECLIPPSE Study: Bridging the Linguistic Divide in Secure Messaging.J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1348242. doi: 10.1155/2017/1348242. Epub 2017 Feb 7. J Diabetes Res. 2017. PMID: 28265579 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Portal Messaging for Asynchronous Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 5;9(2):e35187. doi: 10.2196/35187. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35171108 Free PMC article.
-
High Users of Primary Care Secure Messaging in the Veterans Health Administration.Ann Fam Med. 2025 Jul 28;23(4):285-293. doi: 10.1370/afm.240360. Ann Fam Med. 2025. PMID: 40721336 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Trust in Physicians Matters-Understanding the Role of a Mobile Patient Education System and Patient-Physician Communication in Improving Patient Adherence Behavior: Field Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 20;24(12):e42941. doi: 10.2196/42941. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36538351 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the patient portal among older adults with diagnosed dementia and their care partners.Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Dec;19(12):5663-5671. doi: 10.1002/alz.13354. Epub 2023 Jun 24. Alzheimers Dement. 2023. PMID: 37354066 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Secure Messaging in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Within a Primary Care Setting: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 2;12:e42339. doi: 10.2196/42339. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37129935 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran CR. Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255. https://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e148/ v17i6e148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Ratanawongsa N, Pasick R, Lyles CR. Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 03;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847. https://www.jmir.org/2015/12/e275/ v17i12e275 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 04;77(171):53967–4162. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-09-04/pdf/2012-21050.pdf - PubMed
-
- Henry J, Barker W, Kachay L. Electronic Capabilities for Patient Engagement among U.S. Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2012-2015. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2019. [2021-12-10]. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/briefs/2015_patient_engagem... .
-
- Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 10;17(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171. https://www.jmir.org/2015/2/e44/ v17i2e44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources