Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan 11;327(2):129-137.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23182.

Effect of Anticoagulant Therapy for 6 Weeks vs 3 Months on Recurrence and Bleeding Events in Patients Younger Than 21 Years of Age With Provoked Venous Thromboembolism: The Kids-DOTT Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Anticoagulant Therapy for 6 Weeks vs 3 Months on Recurrence and Bleeding Events in Patients Younger Than 21 Years of Age With Provoked Venous Thromboembolism: The Kids-DOTT Randomized Clinical Trial

Neil A Goldenberg et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Importance: Among patients younger than 21 years of age, the optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism is unknown.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that a 6-week duration of anticoagulant therapy for provoked venous thromboembolism is noninferior to a conventional 3-month therapy duration in patients younger than 21 years of age.

Design, setting, and participants: Randomized clinical trial involving 417 patients younger than 21 years of age with acute, provoked venous thromboembolism enrolled at 42 centers in 5 countries from 2008-2021. The main exclusions were severe anticoagulant deficiencies or prior venous thromboembolism. Patients without persistent antiphospholipid antibodies and whose thrombi were resolved or not completely occlusive upon repeat imaging at 6 weeks after diagnosis underwent randomization. The final visit for the primary end points occurred in January 2021.

Interventions: Total duration for anticoagulant therapy of 6 weeks (n = 207) vs 3 months (n = 210) for provoked venous thromboembolism.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy and safety end points were centrally adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding events within 1 year blinded to treatment group. The primary analysis was noninferiority in the per-protocol population. The noninferiority boundary incorporated a bivariate trade-off that included an absolute increase of 0% in symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism with an absolute risk reduction of 4% in clinically relevant bleeding events (1 of 3 points on the bivariate noninferiority boundary curve).

Results: Among 417 randomized patients, 297 (median age, 8.3 [range, 0.04-20.9] years; 49% female) met criteria for the primary per-protocol population analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for the 1-year cumulative incidence of the primary efficacy outcome was 0.66% (95% CI, 0%-1.95%) in the 6-week anticoagulant therapy group and 0.70% (95% CI, 0%-2.07%) in the 3-month anticoagulant therapy group, and for the primary safety outcome, the incidence was 0.65% (95% CI, 0%-1.91%) and 0.70% (95% CI, 0%-2.06%). Based on absolute risk differences in recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding events between groups, noninferiority was demonstrated. Adverse events occurred in 26% of patients in the 6-week anticoagulant therapy group and in 32% of patients in the 3-month anticoagulant therapy group; the most common adverse event was fever (1.9% and 3.4%, respectively).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients younger than 21 years of age with provoked venous thromboembolism, anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks compared with 3 months met noninferiority criteria based on the trade-off between recurrent venous thromboembolism risk and bleeding risk.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00687882.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Goldenberg reported receiving personal fees from Anthos, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, and Novartis. Dr Kittelson reported receiving personal fees from Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr Bonaca reported receiving grants from EverlyWell, Virta, Wraser, Amgen, ARCA Biopharma, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Better Therapeutics, CellResearch, Heartflow, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Osiris, Regio Bio, and HDL Therapeutics. Dr Halperin reported receiving personal fees from Johnson & Johnson (Ortho-McNeil-Janssen), Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Sidonio reported receiving personal fees from Grifols, Bayer, Pfizer, Biomarin, Novo Nordisk, Catalyst, and Sanofi and receiving grants from Genentech, Octapharma, and Takeda. Dr Spyropoulos reported receiving personal fees from Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Portola, and Bayer and receiving grants from Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Steg reported receiving grants from Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier and receiving personal fees from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Idorsia, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Servier. Dr Schulman reported receiving grants from Octapharma and receiving personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up of Patients in the Kids-DOTT Trial
Kids-DOTT indicates Multicenter Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children. aThe findings related to the observational cohort aims will be published separately. bTwo additional deaths occurred per group that were outside the per-protocol population. cIncluded withdrawal by site principal investigator (n = 1 per group); informed consent no longer in effect due to change in child custody (n = 1 per group); and eligibility criteria no longer met due to underlying disease diagnosis (n = 1 per group). dCalculated as the number of patients randomized minus the number of patients not completing the follow-up visit at 6 months or later, minus the additional number of patients who received less than 80% of prescribed doses of anticoagulant therapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Bivariate Noninferiority Analysis Reflecting the Trade-off Between Adjudicated Symptomatic Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (Primary Efficacy End Point) and Clinically Relevant Bleeding Events (Primary Safety End Point)
The absolute risk differences (anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks minus anticoagulant therapy for 3 months) for both primary end points yield point estimates in a 2-dimensional plane. The 95% CIs for the 2-dimensional point estimates form 95% confidence rectangles. aConstructed using the following points for between-group absolute risk differences in symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding events, respectively: 1% and -12%; 0% and -4%; -5% and 4%. Noninferiority is demonstrated in the per-protocol population and confirmed among all randomized patients by the fact that in each case the entire 95% confidence rectangle lies within the noninferiority zone (white background) to the southwest of the noninferiority boundary. Additional details on the bivariate end point methods appear in Supplement 3 and have been described by Hu et al.

Comment in

References

    1. Barritt DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. Lancet. 1960;1(7138):1309-1312. - PubMed
    1. Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, et al. . Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):698-707. - PubMed
    1. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, et al. . The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(1):1-7. - PubMed
    1. Kittelson JM, Spyropoulos AC, Halperin JL, et al. . Balancing risk and benefit in venous thromboembolism trials. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(8):1443-1448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chi G, Goldhaber SZ, Kittelson JM, et al. . Effect of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis on venous thromboembolism and major bleeding among acutely ill hospitalized medical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(10):1913-1922. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data