Perceptions of Conflicting Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Women: a Multimethod Study
- PMID: 35015260
- PMCID: PMC8971222
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07336-w
Perceptions of Conflicting Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Women: a Multimethod Study
Abstract
Background: Conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations have the potential to diminish informed decision making about screening.
Objective: We examined the knowledge, attitudes, and intentions related to divergent recommendations for breast cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse women.
Design: We used a multimethod study design employing focus groups and questionnaires. Focus groups included: (1) two 10-min presentations on the national screening recommendations and the potential benefits and harms of screening and (2) an interactive discussion. Data were collected: 8/3/2017 to 11/19/2019. Analysis occurred from 1/21/2019 to 7/24/2020.
Participants: Participants were (1) women 40-75 years; (2) English or Spanish speaking; (3)self-identified as Latina, Black, or non-Latina White; and (4) no known increased risk for breast cancer.
Main measures: Main outcomes were participants' knowledge and perceptions of benefits and harms of screening mammography and their screening intentions. Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics.
Key results: One hundred thirty-four women (n=52, 40-49 years; n=82, 50-75 years) participated in 28 focus groups. Participants were Latina (n=44); Black (n=51); and non-Latina White (n=39). Approximately one-quarter (n=32) had limited health literacy and almost one-fifth (n=23) had limited numeracy. In the context of differing national screening recommendations, participants questioned the motives of the recommendation-making agencies, including the role of costs and how costs were considered when making screening recommendations. Participants expressed concern that they were not represented (e.g., race/ethnicity) in the data informing the recommendations. Immediately following the focus groups, most participants expressed intention to screen within the upcoming year (pre n=100 vs. post n=107).
Conclusions: Divergent breast cancer screening recommendations may lead to mistrust and paradoxically reinforce high overall enthusiasm for screening.
Keywords: Cancer; Health disparities; Health literacy; Mammography; Oncology; Qualitative research.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
References
-
- Jin J. Breast cancer screening guidelines in the United States. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1658–1658. - PubMed
-
- Welch HG. Screening mammography — a long run for a short slide? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(13):1276–1278. - PubMed
-
- Miller AB. Conundrums in screening for cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1039–1046. - PubMed
-
- Pace LE, Keating NL. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1327–1335. - PubMed
-
- Bevers TB, Ward JH, Arun BK, et al. Breast cancer risk reduction, version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(7):880–915. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical