Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00556-7.

Point-of-care testing in Paediatric settings in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional study

Meenu Pandey  1 , Mark D Lyttle  2   3 , Katrina Cathie  4 , Alasdair Munro  5 , Thomas Waterfield  6   7 , Damian Roland  8   9 ; GAPRUKI, PERUKI
Collaborators, Affiliations

Point-of-care testing in Paediatric settings in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional study

Meenu Pandey et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) is diagnostic testing performed at or near to the site of the patient. Understanding the current capacity, and scope, of POCT in this setting is essential in order to respond to new research evidence which may lead to wide implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey study of POCT use was conducted between 6th January and 2nd February 2020 on behalf of two United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland-based paediatric research networks (Paediatric Emergency Research UK and Ireland, and General and Adolescent Paediatric Research UK and Ireland).

Results: In total 91/109 (83.5%) sites responded, with some respondents providing details for multiple units on their site based on network membership (139 units in total). The most commonly performed POCT were blood sugar (137/139; 98.6%), urinalysis (134/139; 96.4%) and blood gas analysis (132/139; 95%). The use of POCT for Influenza/Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) (45/139; 32.4%, 41/139; 29.5%), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (13/139; 9.4%), Procalcitonin (PCT) (2/139; 1.4%) and Group A Streptococcus (5/139; 3.6%) and was relatively low. Obstacles to the introduction of new POCT included resources and infrastructure to support test performance and quality assurance.

Conclusion: This survey demonstrates significant consensus in POCT practice in the UK and Ireland but highlights specific inequity in newer biomarkers, some which do not have support from national guidance. A clear strategy to overcome the key obstacles of funding, evidence base, and standardising variation will be essential if there is a drive toward increasing implementation of POCT.

Keywords: Data collection; Health services research; Molecular biology; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram showing the flow of responses
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Woo J, McCabe JB, Chauncey D, Schug T, Henry JB. The evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in the emergency department. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;100:599. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/100.6.599. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sands VM, Auerbach PS, Birnbaum J, Green M. Evaluation of a Portable Clinical Blood Analyzer in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:172. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03190.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee-Lewandrowski E, Corboy D, Lewandrowski K, Sinclair J, McDermot S, Benzer TI. Implementation of a point-of-care satellite laboratory in the emergency department of an academic medical center: impact on test turnaround time and patient emergency department length of stay. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(4):456–460. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-0456-IOAPSL. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parvin CA, Lo SF, Deuser SM, Weaver LG, Lewis LM, Scott MG. Impact of point-of-care testing on patients’ length of stay in a large emergency department. Clin Chem. 1996;42:711. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/42.5.711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson A, Greig-Pylypczuk R, Huisman A. The state of point-of-care testing: a european perspective. Ups J Med Sci. 2015;120(1):1–10. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2015.1006347. - DOI - PMC - PubMed