Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e051965.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051965.

Companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis of national and organisational responses and perspectives

Gill Thomson  1 , Marie-Claire Balaam  2 , Rebecca Nowland Harris  3 , Nicola Crossland  3 , Gill Moncrieff  2 , Stephanie Heys  4 , Arni Sarian  5 , Joanne Cull  1 , Anastasia Topalidou  2 , Soo Downe  2 ; ASPIRE-COVID19 Collaborative Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis of national and organisational responses and perspectives

Gill Thomson et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore stakeholders' and national organisational perspectives on companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19, as part of the Achieving Safe and Personalised maternity care In Response to Epidemics (ASPIRE) COVID-19 UK study.

Setting: Maternity care provision in England.

Participants: Interviews were held with 26 national governmental, professional and service-user organisation leads (July-December 2020). Other data included public-facing outputs logged from 25 maternity Trusts (September/October 2020) and data extracted from 78 documents from eight key governmental, professional and service-user organisations that informed national maternity care guidance and policy (February-December 2020).

Results: Six themes emerged: 'Postcode lottery of care' highlights variations in companionship and visiting practices between trusts/locations, 'Confusion and stress around 'rules'' relates to a lack of and variable information concerning companionship/visiting, 'Unintended consequences' concerns the negative impacts of restricted companionship or visiting on women/birthing people and staff, 'Need for flexibility' highlights concerns about applying companionship and visiting policies irrespective of need, ''Acceptable' time for support' highlights variations in when and if companionship was 'allowed' antenatally and intrapartum and 'Loss of human rights for gain in infection control' emphasises how a predominant focus on infection control was at a cost to psychological safety and human rights.

Conclusions: Policies concerning companionship and visiting have been inconsistently applied within English maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some cases, policies were not justified by the level of risk, and were applied indiscriminately regardless of need. There is an urgent need to determine how to sensitively and flexibly balance risks and benefits and optimise outcomes during the current and future crisis situations.

Keywords: gynaecology; organisational development; public health; qualitative research; risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD012449. 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jordan B. Birth in four cultures: a crosscultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Waveland Press, 1992.
    1. Tani F, Castagna V. Maternal social support, quality of birth experience, and post-partum depression in primiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:689–92. 10.1080/14767058.2016.1182980 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Withers M, Kharazmi N, Lim E. Traditional beliefs and practices in pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: a review of the evidence from Asian countries. Midwifery 2018;56:158–70. 10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Draper J. Whose welfare in the labour room? A discussion of the increasing trend of fathers' birth attendance. Midwifery 1997;13:132–8. 10.1016/S0266-6138(97)90003-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types