Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 12;31(163):210149.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0149-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.

Fiducial markers for stereotactic lung radiation therapy: review of the transthoracic, endovascular and endobronchial approaches

Affiliations
Review

Fiducial markers for stereotactic lung radiation therapy: review of the transthoracic, endovascular and endobronchial approaches

Alessio Casutt et al. Eur Respir Rev. .

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an alternative to surgery for early-stage, inoperable peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. As opposed to linear accelerator (linac)-based (e.g. gating) and free-breathing techniques, CyberKnife® with Synchrony® technology allows accurate radiation delivery by means of a real-time respiratory motion tracking system using, in most cases, metal fiducial markers (FMs) placed in the vicinity of the target. The aims of this review are as follows. First, to describe the safety and efficacy of the transthoracic, endovascular and endobronchial FM insertion techniques for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Second, to analyse performance in terms of the migration and tracking rates of different FM types. Recent developments in FM tracking for central lesions will also be reviewed. In conclusion, for PPLs, the endobronchial approach provides a low rate of pneumothorax, offers the possibility of concurrent diagnostic sampling for both the PPL and the lymph nodes, and, finally, reduces the intervention time compared to other techniques. In this context, coil-tailed and coil-spring FMs have shown the lowest migration rate with a consequently high tracking rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of stereotactic lung radiation therapy using Cyberknife® guided by fiducial markers.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
a) Linear gold (5.0 mm length and 0.5 mm diameter) fiducial marker (white star; Visicoil™ IBA Dosimetry, Bartlett, TN, USA). Reproduced from [47] with permission. b) Coil-spring (diamond-shaped 3:2 mm) fiducial marker (black star; Tornado®, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). In the left part of the photograph, the distal part of the Progreat® (Terumo, Shibuya, Japan) guidewire (black arrow) inserted in the microcatheter (white arrow) can be seen.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Fiducial marker (FM) types.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
a) Reformatted planification computed tomography (CT) scan (performed before irradiation) image of lung windowing with maximum intensity projection (MIP) and an inverted-colour effect. The solid peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL, measuring on long axis 11 mm, 440 mm3) is located at the lateral segment of the left lower lobe and surrounded by two visible coil-spring fiducial markers (cs-FMs; diamond-shaped 3:2 mm; Tornado®, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) in this oblique reformat. b) Reformatted planification CT scan (performed before irradiation) image of lung windowing with MIP of the same PPL. The minimal distance between the PPL and the border of the closest cs-FM is measured (17.5 mm). c) Reformatted planification CT scan (performed before irradiation) image of lung windowing with MIP of the same PPL. Three cs-FMs are identifiable in this oblique reformat.

References

    1. Liu HH, Balter P, Tutt T, et al. . Assessing respiration-induced tumor motion and internal target volume using four-dimensional computed tomography for radiotherapy lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 531–540. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kilby W, Dooley JR, Kuduvalli G, et al. . The Cyberknife robotic radiosurgery system in 2010. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2010; 9: 433–452. doi:10.1177/153303461000900502 - DOI - PubMed
    1. El Shafie RA, Tonndorf-Martini E, Schmitt D, et al. . Single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy vs Cyberknife M6 for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 568. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahig H, Campeau MP, Vu T, et al. . Predictive parameters of Cyberknife fiducial-less (XSight Lung) applicability for treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 87: 583–589. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prunaretty J, Boisselier P, Aillères N, et al. . Tracking, gating, free-breathing, which technique to use for lung stereotactic treatments? A dosimetric comparison. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019; 24: 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2018.11.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms