Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 9;5(6):zrab129.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab129.

Economic cost-utility analysis of stage-directed gastric cancer treatment

Affiliations

Economic cost-utility analysis of stage-directed gastric cancer treatment

Arfon G Powell et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) treatment levies substantial financial burden on health services. Potentially curative surgery with or without chemotherapy is offered to patients with locoregional disease. This study aimed to examine treatment costs related to life-years gained in patients having potentially curative treatment (gastrectomy) and those receiving best supportive care (BSC).

Methods: Some 398 consecutive patients with GC were classified according to treatment modality (116 BSC, 282 gastrectomy). Cost calculations for 1 year's treatment from referral were made according to network diagnostic, staging and treatment algorithms. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Results: GC median survival after BSC was 8 months, costing €5413, compared with gastrectomy median survival of 34 months, costing €22 753 for 1 year's treatment: cost per life-year gained €9319. Cost incurred for stage I GC was €22 434, stage II €23 498, stage III €22 445, and stage IV €22 032. Based on these values, the cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) for BSC for stage I GC was -€8335 stage II -€8952, stage III -€11 317, and stage IV -€25 669.

Conclusion: Potentially curative treatment that included gastrectomy improved OS four-fold compared with BSC and was cost-effective at national thresholds of readiness to pay per QALY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gastric cancer treatment Treatment stratified by stage and modality: quality adjusted life-year (QALY)-adjusted median survival and cost per QALY
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer treatment stratified by stage and treatment modality BSC, best supportive care; S, surgery; CS, perioperative chemotherapy; CS1 and S1, pTNM stage I gastric cancer (GC) treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery respectively; CS2 and S2, pTNM stage II GC treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery respectively; CS3 and S3, pTNM stage III GC treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery respectively; CS4 and S4, pTNM stage IV GC treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery respectively (intention to treat).

References

    1. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit N. An audit of the care received by people with Oesophago-gastric Cancer in England and Wales. 2018. Available from: https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2018/09/NOGCA-2018-Annual-Repor....
    1. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. (eds.). International union against cancer. In: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
    1. Chan DSY, Reid TD, White C, Willicombe A, Blackshaw G, Clark GW. et al. Influence of a regional centralised upper gastrointestinal cancer service model on patient safety, quality of care and survival. Clin Oncol 2013;25:719–725. - PubMed
    1. Powell AGMT, Wheat J, Patel N, Chan D, Foliaki A, Roberts SA. et al.; South-East Wales Oesophagogastric Cancer Collaborative. Value of individual surgeon performance metrics as quality assurance measures in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. BJS Open 2020;4:91–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell A, Coxon AH, Patel N, Chan D, Christian A, Lewis W.. Prognostic significance of post-operative morbidity severity score after potentially curative D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:1516–1527. - PMC - PubMed